Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32632540›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2020

Ischemia and Viability Testing in New-Onset Heart Failure.

Kameel Kassab, Ajoe John Kattoor, Rami Doukky

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Imaging Advances in Heart Failure.Cardiac failure review · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. The prognostic implications of ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in patients undergoing regadenoson stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kameel KassabDivision of Cardiology, Cook County Health, 1901 W. Harrison St. Suite 3620, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Ajoe John KattoorDivision of Cardiology, Cook County Health, 1901 W. Harrison St. Suite 3620, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Rami DoukkyDivision of Cardiology, Cook County Health, 1901 W. Harrison St. Suite 3620, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. rami_doukky@rush.edu.
Cook County Health and Hospitals System · USRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo examine the utility and methods of coronary artery disease (CAD) assessment in patients with new-onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) of unclear etiology. Moreover, we sought to review the role and techniques of assessing myocardial viability to guide coronary revascularization in patients with established ischemic cardiomyopathy. RECENT

findingsData indicates that surgical coronary revascularization in patients with HFrEF due to ischemic cardiomyopathy leads to lower long-term all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Thus, identifying ischemic heart disease in patients with new-onset HFrEF is essential. In addition to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging, coronary CT angiography (CCTA), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging have emerged as effective non-invasive tools in the assessment of CAD in this population. Viability testing remains an area of particular interest and debate and its full potential has not been fully addressed. We propose stepwise algorithms for CAD and viability assessment in this patient population. Non-invasive testing with radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging, CCTA, and CMR is an alternative to ICA for CAD assessment in patients with new-onset HFrEF of unclear etiology. Several non-invasive imaging modalities have proved to be effective in detecting viable myocardium in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The use of viability imaging to guide coronary revascularization should be individualized.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseHeart FailureMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial Perfusion ImagingCoronary AngiographyHumansIschemiaStroke VolumeCoronary artery disease (CAD)Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)IschemiaIschemic cardiomyopathyViability

Identifiers

PMID32632540
OpenAlexW3038641628

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.