Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2020
Team clinic: Expansion of a multidisciplinary care model for adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04190368 (Team Clinic), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Team Clinic: Virtual Expansion of an Innovative Multi-Disciplinary Care Model for Middle School and High School Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can Behavioral Interventions Promote Health Equity in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes? A Narrative Review of Promising Treatments.Current diabetes reports · 2026Review
- Insights from Team Clinic: A Person-Centered Virtual Peer Group Care Model Adapted for Marginalized and Historically Excluded Youth with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D).Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Equity in Medical Care for People Living With Diabetes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent and young adults (AYA) with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) experience more difficulty with glycemic control than patients in all other age groups. The shared medical appointment (SMA) model has been effective in multiple healthcare populations, but the feasibility and effectiveness of SMA in AYA patients with T1D is unclear.
methodsThis research leverages the team's multidisciplinary expertise to develop an engaging intervention toolkit and test the implementation of the Team Clinic care model for the treatment of T1D among middle school adolescents in a large urban children's hospital serving an economically, racially and ethnically diverse population. In Phase 1, the team will manualize the Team Clinic care model into an engaging, age-appropriate educational and intervention toolkit. In Phase 2, the team will conduct a randomized clinical trial to test the feasibility and usability of the toolkit from the provider perspective (team member satisfaction; clinical efficiency; compliance with American Diabetes Association, American Association of Diabetes Educators, and California Children's Services standards; and payor-level cost data) and the preliminary efficacy of the intervention toolkit on patient- and family-level outcomes (attendance, acceptability/satisfaction with care, patient-level cost data, diabetes outcomes, diabetes family conflict, diabetes distress, and depression). DISCUSSION: AYA patients with T1D often receive care in clinics and institutions with limited resources and time. This research tests the feasibility and efficacy of an innovative and potentially cost-effective SMA model to address the unique needs of underserved populations, while meeting national and state clinical standards. Trial registration The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Protocol Record: NCT04190368).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.