Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32635498›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

The Differential Effect of Carbon Dots on Gene Expression and DNA Methylation of Human Embryonic Lung Fibroblasts as a Function of Surface Charge and Dose.

Michal Sima, Kristyna Vrbova, Tana Zavodna, Katerina Honkova, Irena Chvojkova, Antonin Ambroz, Jiri Klema, Andrea Rossnerova, Katerina Polakova, Tomas Malina and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Epigenetic Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanoparticles.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michal SimaDepartment of Nanotoxicology and Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6927-8615
Kristyna VrbovaDepartment of Nanotoxicology and Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Tana ZavodnaDepartment of Genetic Toxicology and Epigenetics, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Katerina HonkovaDepartment of Genetic Toxicology and Epigenetics, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Irena ChvojkovaDepartment of Genetic Toxicology and Epigenetics, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Antonin AmbrozDepartment of Nanotoxicology and Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiri KlemaDepartment of Computer Science, Czech Technical University in Prague, 12135 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1753-9435
Andrea RossnerovaDepartment of Genetic Toxicology and Epigenetics, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Katerina PolakovaRegional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, 77146 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Tomas MalinaRegional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, 77146 Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5631-607X
Jan BelzaRegional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, 77146 Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3104-6007
Jan TopinkaDepartment of Genetic Toxicology and Epigenetics, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel RossnerDepartment of Nanotoxicology and Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6921-5446
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine · CZRegional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials · CZCzech Technical University in Prague · CZ

Funding

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000754Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy LM2015073Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy LO1508Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a toxicological evaluation of two types of carbon dots (CD), similar in size (<10 nm) but differing in surface charge. Whole-genome mRNA and miRNA expression (RNAseq), as well as gene-specific DNA methylation changes, were analyzed in human embryonic lung fibroblasts (HEL 12469) after 4 h and 24 h exposure to concentrations of 10 and 50 µg/mL (for positive charged CD; pCD) or 10 and 100 µg/mL (for negative charged CD, nCD). The results showed a distinct response for the tested nanomaterials (NMs). The exposure to pCD induced the expression of a substantially lower number of mRNAs than those to nCD, with few commonly differentially expressed genes between the two CDs. For both CDs, the number of deregulated mRNAs increased with the dose and exposure time. The pathway analysis revealed a deregulation of processes associated with immune response, tumorigenesis and cell cycle regulation, after exposure to pCD. For nCD treatment, pathways relating to cell proliferation, apoptosis, oxidative stress, gene expression, and cycle regulation were detected. The expression of miRNAs followed a similar pattern: more pronounced changes after nCD exposure and few commonly differentially expressed miRNAs between the two CDs. For both CDs the pathway analysis based on miRNA-mRNA interactions, showed a deregulation of cancer-related pathways, immune processes and processes involved in extracellular matrix interactions. DNA methylation was not affected by exposure to any of the two CDs. In summary, although the tested CDs induced distinct responses on the level of mRNA and miRNA expression, pathway analyses revealed a potential common biological impact of both NMs independent of their surface charge.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCarbonCell ProliferationCells, CulturedDNA MethylationExtracellular MatrixFibroblastsGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingHumansLungMicroRNAsNeoplasmsOxidative StressRNA, MessengerSignal TransductionCarbonMicroRNAsRNA, Messengercarbon dotsDNA methylationgene expressionhuman lung fibroblastssurface charge

Identifiers

PMID32635498
PMCPMC7369946
OpenAlexW3040674415

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.