Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32638342›Full record

ReviewAging clinical and experimental research2021

Highly purified chondroitin sulfate: a literature review on clinical efficacy and pharmacoeconomic aspects in osteoarthritis treatment.

Jean-Yves Reginster, Nicola Veronese

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Low dose NSAIDs and sysadoas in the management of knee osteoarthritis.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Extraction, Physicochemical Properties, andInternational journal of food science · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jean-Yves ReginsterDivision of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium. jyreginster@ulg.ac.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6290-752X
Nicola VeroneseGeriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, 90100, Palermo, Italy.
University of Liège · BEUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal disease and a major cause of negative relevant outcomes, associated with an ever-increasing societal burden. Pharmaceutical-grade chondroitin sulfate (CS) was repeatedly reported to reduce pain and improve function in patients with OA. This article aims to review the evidence for the role of highly purified (hp) CS (Condrosulf

Indexed as

OsteoarthritisOsteoarthritis, KneeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalChondroitin SulfatesEconomics, PharmaceuticalHumansKnee JointTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalChondroitin SulfatesChondroitin sulfateEconomic analysisHand osteoarthritisHip osteoarthritisKnee osteoarthritisOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID32638342
PMCPMC7897612
OpenAlexW3040975859

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.