Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32640745›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Protein-Protein Interactions Efficiently Modeled by Residue Cluster Classes.

Albros Hermes Poot Velez, Fernando Fontove, Gabriel Del Rio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Albros Hermes Poot VelezDepartment of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Instituto de Fisiologia Celular, UNAM, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Fernando FontoveC3 consensus, Leon Guanajuato 37266, Mexico.
Gabriel Del RioDepartment of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Instituto de Fisiologia Celular, UNAM, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8118-4985

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología CB252316PAPIIT-UNAM IN208817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting protein-protein interactions (PPI) represents an important challenge in structural bioinformatics. Current computational methods display different degrees of accuracy when predicting these interactions. Different factors were proposed to help improve these predictions, including choosing the proper descriptors of proteins to represent these interactions, among others. In the current work, we provide a representative protein structure that is amenable to PPI classification using machine learning approaches, referred to as residue cluster classes. Through sampling and optimization, we identified the best algorithm-parameter pair to classify PPI from more than 360 different training sets. We tested these classifiers against PPI datasets that were not included in the training set but shared sequence similarity with proteins in the training set to reproduce the situation of most proteins sharing sequence similarity with others. We identified a model with almost no PPI error (96-99% of correctly classified instances) and showed that residue cluster classes of protein pairs displayed a distinct pattern between positive and negative protein interactions. Our results indicated that residue cluster classes are structural features relevant to model PPI and provide a novel tool to mathematically model the protein structure/function relationship.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinProtein Interaction MappingProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinProteinsmachine learningprotein–protein interactionresidue cluster class

Identifiers

PMID32640745
PMCPMC7370293

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.