Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32645881›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Sex and Gender Disparities in Melanoma.

Maria Bellenghi, Rossella Puglisi, Giada Pontecorvi, Alessandra De Feo, Alessandra Carè, Gianfranco Mattia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Sex disparities in melanoma: Beyond stage at diagnosis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cutaneous melanoma in Kazakhstan: epidemiological trends and economic burden on the healthcare system.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria BellenghiCenter for Gender-specific Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Rossella PuglisiCenter for Gender-specific Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Giada PontecorviCenter for Gender-specific Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Alessandra De FeoLaboratory of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
Alessandra CarèCenter for Gender-specific Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4106-3342
Gianfranco MattiaCenter for Gender-specific Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · IT

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro IG 18815Italian Ministry of Health na
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, the total incidence of cutaneous melanoma is higher in men than in women, with some differences related to ethnicity and age and, above all, sex and gender. Differences exist in respect to the anatomic localization of melanoma, in that it is more frequent on the trunk in men and on the lower limbs in women. A debated issue is if-and to what extent-melanoma development can be attributed to gender-specific behaviors or to biologically intrinsic differences. In the search for factors responsible for the divergences, a pivotal role of sex hormones has been observed, although conflicting results indicate the involvement of other mechanisms. The presence on the X chromosome of numerous miRNAs and coding genes playing immunological roles represents another important factor, whose relevance can be even increased by the incomplete X chromosome random inactivation. Considering the known advantages of the female immune system, a different cancer immune surveillance efficacy was suggested to explain some sex disparities. Indeed, the complexity of this picture emerged when the recently developed immunotherapies unexpectedly showed better improvements in men than in women. Altogether, these data support the necessity of further studies, which consider enrolling a balanced number of men and women in clinical trials to better understand the differences and obtain actual gender-equitable healthcare.

Indexed as

immunityimmunotherapymelanomamicroRNAssex/gendersex-hormones

Identifiers

PMID32645881
PMCPMC7408637
OpenAlexW3038225380

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.