ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2020
Comprehensive Efficacy of the Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor Alogliptin in Practical Clinical Settings: A Prospective Multi-Center Interventional Observational Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to verify the safety and efficacy, including glycemic control, of the selective dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
methodsThis study used a multi-center, open-label, prospective observational design. Type 2 diabetes patients who were undergoing dietary therapy and/or exercise therapy alone without sufficient glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5% and < 10%) were administered alogliptin (25 mg/day). The long-term effects (6 and 12 months) on blood glucose, blood pressure, heart rate, body weight and lipids were assessed.
resultsA final 50 patients were included with a high prevalence of hypertension (77%) and dyslipidemia (72%), and a mean duration of diabetes of 4.5 years. Pre-treatment HbA1c was 7.5% and was significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months (6M: 6.4%, 12M: 6.2%; P < 0.02 vs. 0M, respectively). Body weight, blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly decreased by 6 months and maintained at 12 months. Triglycerides showed a significant decrease at 12 months. No significant differences were observed in HbA1c decrease for different grade of age, duration of diabetes, body mass index and renal function. The degree of decrease in HbA1c was most strongly correlated with pre-treatment HbA1c. Adverse events were noted in three patients, with no serious outcomes.
conclusionThe blood glucose-lowering effect and safety of alogliptin were demonstrated regardless of baseline HbA1c, although its effect appeared stronger with higher pre-treatment HbA1c values. Additionally, alogliptin appears useful for managing atherosclerotic risk factors such as body weight and blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.