Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32670085›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020

Molecular Phenotyping of White Striping and Wooden Breast Myopathies in Chicken.

Christophe Praud, Justine Jimenez, Eva Pampouille, Nathalie Couroussé, Estelle Godet, Elisabeth Le Bihan-Duval, Cecile Berri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Proteomic Changes Associated with Wooden Breast and White Striping in theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transcriptomic Profiles ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Frontiers in physiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christophe PraudINRAE, Université de Tours, UMR BOA, Nouzilly, France.
Justine JimenezINRAE, Université de Tours, UMR BOA, Nouzilly, France.
Eva PampouilleInstitut Technique de l'Aviculture, Paris, France.
Nathalie CourousséINRAE, Université de Tours, UMR BOA, Nouzilly, France.
Estelle GodetINRAE, Université de Tours, UMR BOA, Nouzilly, France.
Elisabeth Le Bihan-DuvalINRAE, Université de Tours, UMR BOA, Nouzilly, France.
Cecile BerriINRAE, Université de Tours, UMR BOA, Nouzilly, France.
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRBiologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture · FRInstitut Technique de l'Aviculture · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The White Striping (WS) and Wooden Breast (WB) defects are two myopathic syndromes whose occurrence has recently increased in modern fast-growing broilers. The impact of these defects on the quality of breast meat is very important, as they greatly affect its visual aspect, nutritional value, and processing yields. The research conducted to date has improved our knowledge of the biological processes involved in their occurrence, but no solution has been identified so far to significantly reduce their incidence without affecting growing performance of broilers. This study aims to follow the evolution of molecular phenotypes in relation to both fast-growing rate and the occurrence of defects in order to identify potential biomarkers for diagnostic purposes, but also to improve our understanding of physiological dysregulation involved in the occurrence of WS and WB. This has been achieved through enzymatic, histological, and transcriptional approaches by considering breast muscles from a slow- and a fast-growing line, affected or not by WS and WB. Fast-growing muscles produced more reactive oxygen species (ROS) than slow-growing ones, independently of WS and WB occurrence. Within fast-growing muscles, despite higher mitochondria density, muscles affected by WS or WB defects did not show higher cytochrome oxidase activity (COX) activity, suggesting altered mitochondrial function. Among the markers related to muscle remodeling and regeneration, immunohistochemical staining of FN1, NCAM, and MYH15 was higher in fast- compared to slow-growing muscles, and their amount also increased linearly with the presence and severity of WS and WB defects, making them potential biomarkers to assess accurately their presence and severity. Thanks to an innovative histological technique based on fluorescence intensity measurement, they can be rapidly quantified to estimate the injuries induced in case of WS and WB. The muscular expression of several other genes correlates also positively to the presence and severity of the defects like

Indexed as

mitochondriamolecular phenotypemuscle remodelingWhite StripingWooden Breast

Identifiers

PMID32670085
PMCPMC7328665
OpenAlexW3037928613

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.