ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2020
The surviving sepsis campaign: basic/translational science research priorities.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting nonsense-mediated mRNA decay from splicing events in sepsis using RNA-sequencing data.Life science alliance · 2025Article
- Noncanonical microprotein regulation of immunity.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Review
- The Effects of Heparan Sulfate Infusion on Endothelial and Organ Injury in a Rat Pneumosepsis Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Long Noncoding RNA U90926 Is Induced in Activated Macrophages, Is Protective in Endotoxic Shock, and Encodes a Novel Secreted Protein.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023Article
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies.Critical care explorations · 2021Review
- The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: research priorities for the administration, epidemiology, scoring and identification of sepsis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2021Review
- Bridging animal and clinical research during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A new-old challenge.EBioMedicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesExpound upon priorities for basic/translational science identified in a recent paper by a group of experts assigned by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. DATA SOURCES: Original paper, search of the literature. STUDY SELECTION: This study is selected by several members of the original task force with specific expertise in basic/translational science. Data extraction and data synthesis are not available.
conclusionsIn the first of a series of follow-up reports to the original paper, several members of the original task force with specific expertise provided a more in-depth analysis of the five identified priorities directly related to basic/translational science. This analysis expounds on what is known about the question and what was identified as priorities for ongoing research. It is hoped that this analysis will aid the development of future research initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.