Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32678175›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by Optical Coherence Elastography.

Anton A Plekhanov, Marina A Sirotkina, Alexander A Sovetsky, Ekaterina V Gubarkova, Sergey S Kuznetsov, Alexander L Matveyev, Lev A Matveev, Elena V Zagaynova, Natalia D Gladkova, Vladimir Y Zaitsev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Brillouin microscopy in cancer research: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anton A PlekhanovPrivolzhsky Research Medical University, Minin Square 10/1, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0301-5358
Marina A SirotkinaPrivolzhsky Research Medical University, Minin Square 10/1, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia. sirotkina_m@mail.ru.
Alexander A SovetskyInstitute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulyanov Street 46, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia.
Ekaterina V GubarkovaPrivolzhsky Research Medical University, Minin Square 10/1, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia.
Sergey S KuznetsovN.A. Semashko Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital, Rodionov Street 190, Nizhny Novgorod, 603126, Russia.
Alexander L MatveyevInstitute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulyanov Street 46, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia.
Lev A MatveevInstitute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulyanov Street 46, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia.
Elena V ZagaynovaPrivolzhsky Research Medical University, Minin Square 10/1, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia.
Natalia D Gladkova *Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Minin Square 10/1, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia.
Vladimir Y Zaitsev *Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulyanov Street 46, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a non-invasive (albeit contact) method based on Optical Coherence Elastography (OCE) enabling the in vivo segmentation of morphological tissue constituents, in particular, monitoring of morphological alterations during both tumor development and its response to therapies. The method uses compressional OCE to reconstruct tissue stiffness map as the first step. Then the OCE-image is divided into regions, for which the Young's modulus (stiffness) falls in specific ranges corresponding to the morphological constituents to be discriminated. These stiffness ranges (characteristic "stiffness spectra") are initially determined by careful comparison of the "gold-standard" histological data and the OCE-based stiffness map for the corresponding tissue regions. After such pre-calibration, the results of morphological segmentation of OCE-images demonstrate a striking similarity with the histological results in terms of percentage of the segmented zones. To validate the sensitivity of the OCE-method and demonstrate its high correlation with conventional histological segmentation we present results obtained in vivo on a murine model of breast cancer in comparative experimental study of the efficacy of two antitumor chemotherapeutic drugs with different mechanisms of action. The new technique allowed in vivo monitoring and quantitative segmentation of (1) viable, (2) dystrophic, (3) necrotic tumor cells and (4) edema zones very similar to morphological segmentation of histological images. Numerous applications in other experimental/clinical areas requiring rapid, nearly real-time, quantitative assessment of tissue structure can be foreseen.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesTomography, Optical CoherenceAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiceNeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID32678175
PMCPMC7366713

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.