Obstructive sleep apnea versus central sleep apnea: prognosis in systolic heart failure.

backgroundIn chronic heart failure (CHF), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) are associated with increased mortality. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic effect of CSR compared to OSA, in otherwise similar groups of CHF patients.

methodsScreening for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) was conducted among patients with CHF of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤45%. The study included 43 patients (4 women) with >25% CSR during sleeping time, and 19 patients (2 women) with OSA and an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of ≥6. Patients were followed for a median of 1,371 days. The primary endpoint was mortality, and the secondary endpoint was combined mortality and hospital admissions.

resultsBaseline parameters did not significantly differ between groups, but CSR patients were older and had higher AHI values than OSA patients. Five OSA patients (26%) died, and 14 (74%) met the combined end-point of death or hospitalization. CSR patients had significantly higher risk for both end-points, with 23 (53%) deaths [log-rank P=0.040; HR, 2.70 (1.01-7.22); P=0.047] and 40 (93%) deaths or readmissions [log-rank P=0.029; HR, 1.96 (1.06-3.63); P=0.032]. After adjustment for confounding risk factors, the association between CSR and death remained significant [HR, 4.73 (1.10-20.28); P=0.037], hospital admission rates were not significantly different.

conclusionsAmong patients with CHF, CSR was associated with higher mortality than OSA independently of age and cardiac systolic function. CSR was also an age-independent predictor of unfavorable outcome, but hospital admission rates were not significantly different between the two groups after adjustment.