Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32703157›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2020

The NETest liquid biopsy is diagnostic for gastric neuroendocrine tumors: observations on the blood-based identification of microscopic and macroscopic residual diseaseOK.

A Malczewska, A Procner, A Walter, K Kusnierz, W Zajecki, H Aslanian, B Kos-Kudla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A MalczewskaDepartment of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Medical University of Silesia, ul. Ceglana 35, 40-514, Katowice, Poland. malczewska.an@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0321-4832
A ProcnerDepartment of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Medical University of Silesia, ul. Ceglana 35, 40-514, Katowice, Poland.
A WalterDepartment of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Medical University of Silesia, ul. Ceglana 35, 40-514, Katowice, Poland.
K KusnierzDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, ul. Medykow 14, 40-752, Katowice, Poland.
W ZajeckiDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Silesia, ul. 3 Maja 13-15, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland.
H AslanianDepartment of Digestive Diseases, Center for Advanced Endoscopy, Yale University School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. harry.aslanian@yale.edu.
B Kos-KudlaDepartment of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Medical University of Silesia, ul. Ceglana 35, 40-514, Katowice, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PLYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNETest, a novel multi-gene liquid biopsy has utility in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) diagnosis and identification of residual disease. We independently assessed utility of the NETest to diagnose gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (GNENs) and identify micro- and macroscopic residual disease.

methodsCohorts comprised histologically confirmed GNENs at biopsy, n = 46; GNETs Type 1: 42 (32 NET G1, 10 NET G2), a GNET Type 3: 1 well-differentiated NET G3, neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) (n = 3), and controls (n = 63). Disease status at sampling was assessed by gastroscopy, histology (resection margin [R] positivity of polypectomy or biopsy), EUS, CT or MRI, and/or DATA: mean ± SD.

resultsDisease extent: Image-negative (n = 30) (21 R0, 9 R1); Image-positive, n = 16. DIAGNOSIS: NETest was increased in GNETs (23 ± 11) vs. controls (7 ± 4, p < 0.0001). In histology-positive, the NETest accuracy was 100% (25/25). Microscopic disease: In image-negative but R1, NETest was elevated in 100% (9/9; 28 ± 9). Levels were elevated vs. controls (7 ± 4, p < 0.0001), or R0 (16 ± 11, p = 0.02). Eight of 21 R0, exhibited positive NETest. Macroscopic disease: Gastric lesions were multiple: 38%, single: 62%, submucosal: 13%, or ulcerated: 13%. Lesions size was ≤5 mm (50%), > 5-9.9 mm (17%), 10-19.9 mm (17%), ≥20 mm (17%) [≥10 mm: 34%). The NETest accuracy was 100% (16/16). Levels (28 ± 7) were higher than controls (7 ± 4, p < 0.0001) or R0 (16 ± 11, p = 0.002) but not to R1 (28 ± 9, p = 0.5).

conclusionsNETest is diagnostic for gastric NETs. Elevated levels identify both microscopic and macroscopic residual disease. In histology/image-negative disease, elevated NETest may reflect early evidence of increased neuroendocrine gene expression of hypergastrinemia-induced neoplastic transformation of enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells to tumor status. A sensitive liquid biopsy has utility in the management and surveillance of gastric NET disease.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansLiquid BiopsyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerECL cellGastricGastrinGastroscopyLiquid biopsyNETNETestNeuroendocrine tumorProliferome

Identifiers

PMID32703157
PMCPMC7376918
OpenAlexW3045368517

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.