Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706382›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2020

Association of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Burden With Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis Assessed by Serial Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography.

Donghee Han, Daniel S Berman, Robert J H Miller, Daniele Andreini, Matthew J Budoff, Filippo Cademartiri, Kavitha Chinnaiyan, Jung Hyun Choi, Edoardo Conte, Hugo Marques and 21 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Distinct types of regulated cell death in atherosclerosis.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Plasma proteomics improves prediction of coronary plaque progression.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 20 institutions in 7 countries.

Donghee HanDepartment of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Daniel S BermanDepartment of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Robert J H MillerDepartment of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Daniele AndreiniCentro Cardiologico Monzino, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.
Matthew J BudoffDepartment of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California.
Filippo CademartiriCardiovascular Imaging Center, SDN Institute, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS), Naples, Italy.
Kavitha ChinnaiyanDepartment of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Jung Hyun ChoiPusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Edoardo ConteCentro Cardiologico Monzino, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.
Hugo MarquesUNICA, Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro de Araújo GonçalvesUNICA, Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ilan GottliebDepartment of Radiology, Casa de Saúde São José, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Martin HadamitzkyDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jonathon LeipsicDepartment of Medicine and Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Erica MaffeiDepartment of Radiology, Area Vasta 1-ASUR Marche, Urbino, Italy.
Gianluca PontoneCentro Cardiologico Monzino, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.
Sangshoon ShinEwha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Yong-Jin KimSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Byoung Kwon LeeGangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun Ju ChunSeoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, South Korea.
Ji Min SungDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang-Eun LeeDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.
Renu VirmaniDepartment of Pathology, CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Habib SamadyDivision of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Peter StoneCardiovascular Division, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jagat NarulaZena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Heart, New York, New York.
Jeroen J BaxDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leslee J ShawDepartment of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Fay Y LinDepartment of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
James K MinCleerly, Inc, New York, New York.
Hyuk-Jae ChangDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCentro Cardiologico Monzino · ITYonsei University Health System · KRHospital da Luz · PTBeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USCVPath Institute · USDeutsches Herzzentrum München · DEEmory University · USEwha Womans University · KRGangnam Severance Hospital · KRHarvard University · USIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITLeiden University Medical Center · NLMount Sinai Hospital · USNew York Hospital Queens · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USPusan National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRThe Lundquist Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Several studies have reported that the progression of coronary atherosclerosis, as measured by serial coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography, is associated with the risk of future cardiovascular events. However, the cumulative consequences of multiple risk factors for plaque progression and the development of adverse plaque characteristics have not been well characterized. Objectives: To examine the association of cardiovascular risk factor burden, as assessed by atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score, with the progression of coronary atherosclerosis and the development of adverse plaque characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study is a subgroup analysis of participant data from the prospective observational Progression of Atherosclerotic Plaque Determined by Computed Tomographic Angiography Imaging (PARADIGM) study, which evaluated the association between serial coronary CT angiography findings and clinical presentation. The PARADIGM international multicenter registry, which includes 13 centers in 7 countries (Brazil, Canada, Germany, Italy, Portugal, South Korea, and the US), was used to identify 1005 adult patients without known coronary artery disease who underwent serial coronary CT angiography scans (median interscan interval, 3.3 years; interquartile range [IQR], 2.6-4.8 years) between December 24, 2003, and December 16, 2015. Based on the 10-year ASCVD risk score, the cardiovascular risk factor burden was classified as low (<7.5%), intermediate (7.5%-20.0%), or high (>20.0%). Data were analyzed from February 8, 2019, to April 17, 2020. Exposures: Association of baseline ASCVD risk burden with plaque progression. Main Outcomes and Measures: Noncalcified plaque, calcified plaque, and total plaque volumes (mm3) were measured. Noncalcified plaque was subclassified using predefined Hounsfield unit thresholds for fibrous, fibrofatty, and low-attenuation plaque. The percent atheroma volume (PAV) was defined as plaque volume divided by vessel volume. Adverse plaque characteristics were defined as the presence of positive remodeling, low-attenuation plaque, or spotty calcification. Results: In total, 1005 patients (mean [SD] age, 60 [8] years; 575 men [57.2%]) were included in the analysis. Of those, 463 patients (46.1%) had a low 10-year ASCVD risk score (low-risk group), 373 patients (37.1%) had an intermediate ASCVD risk score (intermediate-risk group), and 169 patients (16.8%) had a high ASCVD risk score (high-risk group). The annualized progression rate of PAV for total plaque, calcified plaque, and noncalcified plaque was associated with increasing ASCVD risk (r = 0.26 for total plaque, r = 0.23 for calcified plaque, and r = 0.11 for noncalcified plaque; P < .001). The annualized PAV progression of total plaque, calcified plaque, and noncalcified plaque was significantly greater in the high-risk group compared with the low-risk and intermediate-risk groups (for total plaque, 0.99% vs 0.45% and 0.58%, respectively; P < .001; for calcified plaque, 0.61% vs 0.23% and 0.36%; P < .001; and for noncalcified plaque, 0.38%vs 0.22% and 0.23%; P = .01). When further subclassified by noncalcified plaque type, the annualized PAV progression of fibrofatty and low-attenuation plaque was greater in the high-risk group (0.09% and 0.02%, respectively) compared with the low- to intermediate-risk group (n = 836; 0.02% [P = .02] and 0.001% [P = .008], respectively). The interval development of adverse plaque characteristics was greater in the high-risk group compared with the low-risk and intermediate-risk groups (for new positive remodeling, 73 patients [43.2%] vs 151 patients [32.6%] and 133 patients [35.7%], respectively; P = .02; for new low-attenuation plaque, 26 patients [15.4%] vs 44 patients [9.5%] and 35 patients [9.4%]; P = .02; and for new spotty calcification, 37 patients [21.9%] vs 52 patients [11.2%] and 54 patients [14.5%]; P = .002). The progression of noncalcified plaque subclasses and the interval development of adverse plaque characteristics did not significantly differ between the low-risk and intermediate-risk groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Progression of coronary atherosclerosis occurred across all ASCVD risk groups and was associated with an increase in 10-year ASCVD risk. The progression of fibrofatty and low-attenuation plaques and the development of adverse plaque characteristics was greater in patients with a high risk of ASCVD.

Indexed as

Risk FactorsAgedBrazilCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPortugalProspective StudiesQuebec

Identifiers

PMID32706382
PMCPMC7382001
OpenAlexW3044629917

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.