Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710189›Full record

SynthesisMolecular and cellular biochemistry2020

Autophagy modulation in animal models of corneal diseases: a systematic review.

Guadalupe Martínez-Chacón, Francisco Javier Vela, José Luis Campos, Elena Abellán, Sokhna M S Yakhine-Diop, Alberto Ballestín

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Repair of Corneal Epithelial Defects.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Squishy matters - Corneal mechanobiology in health and disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Autophagy in the normal and diseased cornea.Experimental eye research · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guadalupe Martínez-ChacónDepartment of Microsurgery, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, 10071, Cáceres, Spain. gmartinezchacon@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6301-8828
Francisco Javier VelaDepartment of Microsurgery, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, 10071, Cáceres, Spain.
José Luis CamposDepartment of Microsurgery, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, 10071, Cáceres, Spain.
Elena AbellánDepartment of Microsurgery, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, 10071, Cáceres, Spain.
Sokhna M S Yakhine-DiopDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Nursing and Occupational Therapy, University of Extremadura, Avda de La Universidad S/N, 10003, Cáceres, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4868-3352
Alberto BallestínDepartment of Microsurgery, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, 10071, Cáceres, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7150-9758
Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión Jesús Usón · ESBiomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is an intracellular catabolic process implicated in the recycling and degradation of intracellular components. Few studies have defined its role in corneal pathologies. Animal models are essential for understanding autophagy regulation and identifying new treatments to modulate its effects. A systematic review (SR) was conducted of studies employing animal models for investigations of autophagy in corneal diseases. Studies were identified using a structured search strategy (TS = autophagy AND cornea*) in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed from inception to September 2019. In this study, 230 articles were collected, of which 28 were analyzed. Mouse models were used in 82% of the studies, while rat, rabbit, and newt models were used in the other 18%. The most studied corneal layer was the epithelium, followed by the endothelium and stroma. In 13 articles, genetically modified animal models were used to study Fuch endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), granular corneal dystrophy type 2 (GCD2), dry eye disease (DED), and corneal infection. In other 13 articles, animal models were experimentally induced to mimic DED, keratitis, inflammation, and surgical scenarios. Furthermore, in 50% of studies, modulators that activated or inhibited autophagy were also investigated. Protective effects of autophagy activators were demonstrated, including rapamycin for DED and keratitis, lithium for FECD, LYN-1604 for DED, cysteamine and miR-34c antagomir for damaged corneal epithelium. Three autophagy suppressors were also found to have therapeutic effects, such as aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-riboside (AICAR) for corneal allogeneic transplantation, celecoxib and chloroquine for DED.

Indexed as

AutophagyDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsCorneal DiseasesHumansMiceRatsAnimal modelAutophagyCorneal diseasePRISMASystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32710189
OpenAlexW3044740148

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.