Evidence mapPaperPMID 32714944Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2020

Dare to Compare. Development of Atherosclerotic Lesions in Human, Mouse, and Zebrafish.

Viviana L Vedder, Zouhair Aherrahrou, Jeanette Erdmann

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Alleviating effect ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Neuroimmune cardiovascular interfaces in atherosclerosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Recent Application of Zebrafish Models in Atherosclerosis Research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Viviana L VedderInstitute for Cardiogenetics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Zouhair AherrahrouInstitute for Cardiogenetics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Jeanette ErdmannInstitute for Cardiogenetics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis, are the leading cause of death worldwide. Although mice are currently the most commonly used model for atherosclerosis, zebrafish are emerging as an alternative, especially for inflammatory and lipid metabolism studies. Here, we review the history of

Indexed as

animal modelsAPOEatherosclerosishuman diseaseimmune responseLDLRmousezebrafish

Identifiers

PMID32714944
PMCPMC7344238
OpenAlexW3038674680

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.