Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719491›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The 'Threat of Scream' paradigm: a tool for studying sustained physiological and subjective anxiety.

Morgan Beaurenaut, Elliot Tokarski, Guillaume Dezecache, Julie Grèzes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rough is salient: a conserved vocal niche to hijack the brain's salience system.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Hypercapnia Reduces Perceived Heat Pain in Healthy Subjects.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dynamic Tracking of State AnxietyFrontiers in psychiatry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Morgan BeaurenautLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, ENS, PSL Research University, INSERM, Département d'études Cognitives, Paris, France. beaurenaut.morgan@gmail.com.
Elliot TokarskiLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, ENS, PSL Research University, INSERM, Département d'études Cognitives, Paris, France.
Guillaume Dezecache *Department of Experimental Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Julie Grèzes *Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, ENS, PSL Research University, INSERM, Département d'études Cognitives, Paris, France. julie.grezes@ens.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives · FRUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in understanding the emergence of pathological anxiety depends on the availability of paradigms effective in inducing anxiety in a simple, consistent and sustained manner. The Threat-of-Shock paradigm has typically been used to elicit anxiety, but poses ethical issues when testing vulnerable populations. Moreover, it is not clear from past studies whether anxiety can be sustained in experiments of longer durations. Here, we present empirical support for an alternative approach, the 'Threat-of-Scream' paradigm, in which shocks are replaced by screams. In two studies, participants were repeatedly exposed to blocks in which they were at risk of hearing aversive screams at any time vs. blocks in which they were safe from screams. Contrary to previous 'Threat-of-Scream' studies, we ensured that our screams were neither harmful nor intolerable by presenting them at low intensity. We found higher subjective reports of anxiety, higher skin conductance levels, and a positive correlation between the two measures, in threat compared to safe blocks. These results were reproducible and we found no significant change over time. The unpredictable delivery of low intensity screams could become an essential part of a psychology toolkit, particularly when investigating the impact of anxiety in a diversity of cognitive functions and populations.

Indexed as

AnxietyFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32719491
PMCPMC7385655
OpenAlexW3044039855

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.