Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719684›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2020

COVID-19 Coronavirus Vaccine Design Using Reverse Vaccinology and Machine Learning.

Edison Ong, Mei U Wong, Anthony Huffman, Yongqun He

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 222 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
222citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

222 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 453 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. AΙ-Driven Drug Repurposing: Applications and Challenges.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

162 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edison OngDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Mei U WongUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Anthony HuffmanDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Yongqun HeDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Ontology-based Information Network to Support Vaccine ResearchR01AI081062 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HE, YONGQUN · 2009 to 2012
$1.1M
Ontology-supported Integrative Analysis and Visualization of Vaccine-induced Pathways and NetworksUH2AI132931 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HE, YONGQUN, WU, GUANMING · 2019 to 2020
$437k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI081062NIAID NIH HHS UH2 AI132931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To ultimately combat the emerging COVID-19 pandemic, it is desired to develop an effective and safe vaccine against this highly contagious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. Our literature and clinical trial survey showed that the whole virus, as well as the spike (S) protein, nucleocapsid (N) protein, and membrane (M) protein, have been tested for vaccine development against SARS and MERS. However, these vaccine candidates might lack the induction of complete protection and have safety concerns. We then applied the Vaxign and the newly developed machine learning-based Vaxign-ML reverse vaccinology tools to predict COVID-19 vaccine candidates. Our Vaxign analysis found that the SARS-CoV-2 N protein sequence is conserved with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV but not from the other four human coronaviruses causing mild symptoms. By investigating the entire proteome of SARS-CoV-2, six proteins, including the S protein and five non-structural proteins (nsp3, 3CL-pro, and nsp8-10), were predicted to be adhesins, which are crucial to the viral adhering and host invasion. The S, nsp3, and nsp8 proteins were also predicted by Vaxign-ML to induce high protective antigenicity. Besides the commonly used S protein, the nsp3 protein has not been tested in any coronavirus vaccine studies and was selected for further investigation. The nsp3 was found to be more conserved among SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV than among 15 coronaviruses infecting human and other animals. The protein was also predicted to contain promiscuous MHC-I and MHC-II T-cell epitopes, and the predicted linear B-cell epitopes were found to be localized on the surface of the protein. Our predicted vaccine targets have the potential for effective and safe COVID-19 vaccine development. We also propose that an "Sp/Nsp cocktail vaccine" containing a structural protein(s) (Sp) and a non-structural protein(s) (Nsp) would stimulate effective complementary immune responses.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsMachine LearningPandemicsPneumonia, ViralViral VaccinesAnimalsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesEpitopes, B-LymphocyteHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusSARS-CoV-2Viral ProteinsCOVID-19 VaccinesEpitopes, B-LymphocyteViral ProteinsViral VaccinesCOVID-19machine learningnon-structural protein 3reverse vaccinologyS proteinvaccinevaxignvaxign-ML

Identifiers

PMID32719684
PMCPMC7350702
OpenAlexW3040508291

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.