ReviewCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2019
Tunneling nanotubes: A bridge for heterogeneity in glioblastoma and a new therapeutic target?
Review in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of chemotherapeutic drugs and cytochalasin B on tunneling nanotubes in U87 MG cells.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Interplay between tunneling nanotubes and Wnt Signaling: Insights into cytoskeletal regulation and therapeutic potential.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Review
- Editorial: The role of autophagy in cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Potential Mechanism and Involvement of p120-Catenin in the Malignant Biology of Glioma.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2024Article
- Metabolic Reprogramming in Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Review of Pathways and Therapeutic Targets.Cells · 2024Review
- Article
- Glioblastoma-Associated Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells and Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts: Partners in Crime?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Tunneling Nanotubes: The Cables for Viral Spread and Beyond.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024Review
- Methyltransferase K-D-K-E motif influences the intercellular transmission of Newcastle disease virus.Virulence · 2023Article
- Review
- Highly Specialized Mechanisms for Mitochondrial Transport in Neurons: From Intracellular Mobility to Intercellular Transfer of Mitochondria.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Mitochondria Transfer from Mesenchymal Stem Cells Confers Chemoresistance to Glioblastoma Stem Cells through Metabolic Rewiring.Cancer research communications · 2023Article
- Adopted neoplastic cells and the consequences of their existence.Oncotarget · 2023Article
- Cellular Conversations in Glioblastoma Progression, Diagnosis and Treatment.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2023Review
- Revealing the structure and organization of intercellular tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) by STORM imaging.Nanoscale advances · 2022Article
- Antioxidant Systems, lncRNAs, and Tunneling Nanotubes in Cell Death Rescue from Cigarette Smoke Exposure.Cells · 2022Review
- Tunneling Nanotubes: A New Target for Nanomedicine?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Specialized Intercellular Communications via Tunnelling Nanotubes in Acute and Chronic Leukemia.Cancers · 2022Review
- The 3.0 Cell Communication: New Insights in the Usefulness of Tunneling Nanotubes for Glioblastoma Treatment.Cancers · 2021Review
- Effects of the Anti-Tumorigenic Agent AT101 on Human Glioblastoma Cells in the Microenvironmental Glioma Stem Cell Niche.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe concept of tumour heterogeneity is not novel but is fast becoming a paradigm by which to explain part of the highly recalcitrant nature of aggressive malignant tumours. Glioblastoma is a prime example of such difficult-to-treat, invasive, and incurable malignancies. With the advent of the post-genomic age and increased access to next-generation sequencing technologies, numerous publications have described the presence and extent of intratumoural and intertumoural heterogeneity present in glioblastoma. Moreover, there have been numerous reports more directly correlating the heterogeneity of glioblastoma to its refractory, reoccurring, and inevitably terminal nature. It is therefore prudent to consider the different forms of heterogeneity seen in glioblastoma and how to harness this understanding to better strategize novel therapeutic approaches. One of the most central questions of tumour heterogeneity is how these numerous different cell types (both tumour and non-tumour) in the tumour mass communicate. RECENT
findingsThis chapter provides a brief review on the variable heterogeneity of glioblastoma, with a focus on cellular heterogeneity and on modalities of communication that can induce further molecular diversity within the complex and ever-evolving tumour microenvironment. We provide particular emphasis on the emerging role of actin-based cellular conduits called tunnelling nanotubes (TNTs) and tumour microtubes (TMs) and outline the perceived current problems in the field that need to be resolved before pharmacological targeting of TNTs can become a reality.
conclusionsWe conclude that TNTs and TMs provide a new and exciting avenue for the therapeutic targeting of glioblastoma and that numerous inroads have already made into TNT and TM biology. However, to target TMs and TNTs, several advances must be made before this aim can become a reality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.