ReviewPharmacoEconomics2020
Integrative Review of Managed Entry Agreements: Chances and Limitations.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Affordability of new drugs in the Brazilian public health system: a 13-year monitoring analysis of reimbursement decisions based on health technology assessments (2012-2024).Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Pricing of innovative medicines and advanced therapies worldwide: an scoping review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- The evolution of cancer therapies and their Implications for health technology assessment in Australia.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Review
- Navigating market access after conditional reimbursement: a communication roadmap for disinvesting orphan drugs.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026Article
- Stakeholders' experiences with a clinician-led access programme linking evidence generation and reimbursement for precision cancer treatments: the drug access protocol in the Netherlands.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- Shifting sands in Saudi Arabian healthcare system towards value-based care: navigating the changing landscape.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Managed Entry Agreements for Pharmaceutical Products in Three Maghreb Countries: Payer and Supplier Perspectives.Journal of market access & health policy · 2025Article
- Implementing performance-based risk-sharing agreements in non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy: a real-world data case study.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Value-Based Healthcare in Practice: IDEATE, a Collaboration to Design and Test an Outcomes-Based Agreement for a Medicine in Wales.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Article
- Evidence Following Conditional NICE Technology Appraisal Recommendations: A Critical Analysis of Methods, Quality and Risk of Bias.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Putting meat on the bone: how to fast-track innovative medicines to those who need them and generate data to justify continued use.Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
- Budget Impact Analysis of Olaparib in Combination with Bevacizumab for Maintenance Therapy for Ovarian Cancer in Argentina.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2024Article
- Market Transparency in Medicine Pricing: Pathways to Fair Pricing.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Paving the path for implementation of clinical genomic sequencing globally: Are we ready?Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
- Value-based payment for high-cost treatments in Singapore: a qualitative study of stakeholders' perspectives.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024Article
- Introduction of managed entry agreements in Korea: Problem, policy, and politics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- When Reality Does Not Meet Expectations-Experiences and Perceived Attitudes of Dutch Stakeholders Regarding Payment and Reimbursement Models for High-Priced Hospital Drugs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Procurement of medicines to treat cancer, 2015-2020, China.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022Article
- How to balance valuable innovation with affordable access to medicines in Belgium?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Crizotinib Versus Conventional Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment for ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Oncology and therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveManaged entry agreements (MEAs) consist of a set of instruments to reduce the uncertainty and the budget impact of new high-priced medicines; however, there are concerns. There is a need to critically appraise MEAs with their planned introduction in Brazil. Accordingly, the objective of this article is to identify and appraise key attributes and concerns with MEAs among payers and their advisers, with the findings providing critical considerations for Brazil and other high- and middle-income countries.
methodsAn integrative review approach was adopted. This involved a review of MEAs across countries. The review question was 'What are the health technology MEAs that have been applied around the world?' This review was supplemented with studies not retrieved in the search known to the senior-level co-authors including key South American markets. It also involved senior-level decision makers and advisers providing guidance on the potential advantages and disadvantages of MEAs and ways forward.
resultsTwenty-five studies were included in the review. Most MEAs included medicines (96.8%), focused on financial arrangements (43%) and included mostly antineoplastic medicines. Most countries kept key information confidential including discounts or had not published such data. Few details were found in the literature regarding South America. Our findings and inputs resulted in both advantages including reimbursement and disadvantages including concerns with data collection for outcome-based schemes.
conclusionsWe are likely to see a growth in MEAs with the continual launch of new high-priced and often complex treatments, coupled with increasing demands on resources. Whilst outcome-based MEAs could be an important tool to improve access to new innovative medicines, there are critical issues to address. Comparing knowledge, experiences, and practices across countries is crucial to guide high- and middle-income countries when designing their future MEAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32734573What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.