Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32734573›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics2020

Integrative Review of Managed Entry Agreements: Chances and Limitations.

Carolina Zampirolli Dias, Brian Godman, Ludmila Peres Gargano, Pâmela Santos Azevedo, Marina Morgado Garcia, Maurílio Souza Cazarim, Laís Lessa Neiva Pantuzza, Nelio Gomes Ribeiro-Junior, André Luiz Pereira, Marcus Carvalho Borin and 26 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pricing of innovative medicines and advanced therapies worldwide: an scoping review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Procurement of medicines to treat cancer, 2015-2020, China.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Carolina Zampirolli DiasGraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627. Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2181-4268
Brian GodmanStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6539-6972
Ludmila Peres GarganoGraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627. Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0666-7776
Pâmela Santos AzevedoGraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627. Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1947-6290
Marina Morgado GarciaGraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627. Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7418-2586
Maurílio Souza CazarimDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmacy School, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-5903
Laís Lessa Neiva PantuzzaGraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627. Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-8807
Nelio Gomes Ribeiro-JuniorSUS Collaborating Centre for Technology Assessment and Excellence in Health (CCATES), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4377-4060
André Luiz PereiraGerência de Planejamento, Monitoramento e Avaliação Assistenciais Fundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5558-2157
Marcus Carvalho BorinGraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627. Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0918-6505
Isabella de Figueiredo ZuppoGraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627. Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0473-264X
Roberto IunesThe World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Tomas PippoPan American Health Organization (PAHO), Brasília, Brazil.
Renata Curi HauegenNational Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation on Diseases of Neglected Populations (INCT-IDPN), Center for Technological Development in Health (CDTS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2256-2966
Carlos VassaloFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Tracey-Lea LabaCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Haymarket, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5182-9092
Steven SimoensDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9512-2005
Sergio MárquezEconomista, Administradora de los Recursos del Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud (ADRES), Bogotá, Colombia.
Carolina GomezThink Tank "Medicines, Information and Power", National University of Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Luka VoncinaFaculty of Health Studies, Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1864-2381
Gisbert W SelkeAOK Research Institute (WIdO), Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9614-9875
Livio GarattiniCESAV, Centre for Health Economics, IRCCS Institute for Pharmacological Research 'Mario Negri', Ranica, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8952-9968
Hye-Young KwonDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Strathclyde University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9772-1354
Jolanta GulbinovicDepartment of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Aneta LipinskaAgency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System (AOTMiT), Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej PomorskiAgency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System (AOTMiT), Warsaw, Poland.
Lindsay McClureProcurement, Commissioning and Facilities, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Jurij FürstHealth Insurance Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Rosana GambogiNational Resources Fund, Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0781-7745
Carla Hernandez OrtizNational Resources Fund, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Vânia Cristina Canuto SantosSecretariat of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil.
Denizar Vianna AraújoSecretariat of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3281-671X
Vânia Eloisa AraujoGraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627. Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0345-8522
Francisco de Assis AcurcioGraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627. Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5880-5261
Juliana Alvares-TeodoroGraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627. Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0210-0721
Augusto Afonso Guerra-JuniorGraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627. Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil. augustoguerrajr@ufmg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5256-0577

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveManaged entry agreements (MEAs) consist of a set of instruments to reduce the uncertainty and the budget impact of new high-priced medicines; however, there are concerns. There is a need to critically appraise MEAs with their planned introduction in Brazil. Accordingly, the objective of this article is to identify and appraise key attributes and concerns with MEAs among payers and their advisers, with the findings providing critical considerations for Brazil and other high- and middle-income countries.

methodsAn integrative review approach was adopted. This involved a review of MEAs across countries. The review question was 'What are the health technology MEAs that have been applied around the world?' This review was supplemented with studies not retrieved in the search known to the senior-level co-authors including key South American markets. It also involved senior-level decision makers and advisers providing guidance on the potential advantages and disadvantages of MEAs and ways forward.

resultsTwenty-five studies were included in the review. Most MEAs included medicines (96.8%), focused on financial arrangements (43%) and included mostly antineoplastic medicines. Most countries kept key information confidential including discounts or had not published such data. Few details were found in the literature regarding South America. Our findings and inputs resulted in both advantages including reimbursement and disadvantages including concerns with data collection for outcome-based schemes.

conclusionsWe are likely to see a growth in MEAs with the continual launch of new high-priced and often complex treatments, coupled with increasing demands on resources. Whilst outcome-based MEAs could be an important tool to improve access to new innovative medicines, there are critical issues to address. Comparing knowledge, experiences, and practices across countries is crucial to guide high- and middle-income countries when designing their future MEAs.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyDrug IndustryBrazilCommerceHumansIncome

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.