ArticlePeerJ2020
Plastome comparative genomics in maples resolves the infrageneric backbone relationships.
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding the Chloroplast Genome of Korean endemic plant Acer okamotoanum: Comparative Genomics, Phylogenetic Insights, and Potential for Marker Development.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Article
- Chloroplast genomes of Simarouba Aubl., molecular evolution and comparative analyses within Sapindales.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Testing plastomes and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences as the next-generation DNA barcodes for species identification and phylogenetic analysis in Acer.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence of the Korean maple tree (Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2022Article
- Structural Characterization of theFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Insights Into Comparative Analyses and Phylogenomic Implications ofFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maples (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.