Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32743879›Full record

ReviewMolecular reproduction and development2020

Characterization of rodent Sertoli cell primary cultures.

Helena D Zomer, Prabhakara P Reddi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular reproduction and development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Characterization of primary canine Sertoli cells as a model to test male reproductive toxicant.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helena D ZomerDepartment of Comparative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-2092-6906
Prabhakara P ReddiDepartment of Comparative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-4891-8964
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

RNA Pol II Pausing is Critical for Spermatogenesis and Male FertilityR01HD094546 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI REDDI, PRABHAKARA P · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Transcriptional Regulation During SpermiogenesisR01HD036239 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI REDDI, PRABHAKARA P · 2004 to 2010
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD036239NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD094546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sertoli cells play a vital role in spermatogenesis by offering physical and nutritional support to the differentiating male germ cells. They form the blood-testis barrier and secrete growth factors essential for germ cell differentiation. Sertoli cell primary cultures are critical for understanding the regulation of spermatogenesis; however, obtaining pure cultures has been a challenge. Rodent Sertoli cell isolation protocols do not rule out contamination by the interstitial or connective tissue cells. Sertoli cell-specific markers could be helpful, but there is no consensus. Vimentin, the most commonly used marker, is not specific for Sertoli cells since its expression has been reported in peritubular myoid cells, mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts, macrophages, and endothelial cells, which contaminate Sertoli cell preparations. Markers based on transcription and growth factors also have limitations. Thus, the impediment to obtaining pure Sertoli cell cultures pertains to both the method of isolation and marker usage. The aim of this review is to discuss improvements to current methods of rodent Sertoli cell primary cultures, assess the properties of prepubertal versus mature Sertoli cell cultures, and propose steps to improve cellular characterization. Potential benefits of using contemporary approaches, including lineage tracing, specific cell ablation, and RNA-seq for obtaining Sertoli-specific transcript markers are discussed. Evaluating the specificity and applicability of these markers at the protein level to characterize Sertoli cells in culture would be critical. This review is expected to positively impact future work using primary cultures of rodent Sertoli cells.

Indexed as

Primary Cell CultureRodentiaAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedHumansMaleSertoli CellsSpermatogenesismouseratSertoli cell puritySertoli-specific markersvimentin

Identifiers

PMID32743879
PMCPMC7685524
OpenAlexW3047526324

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.