ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2020
Associating Multi-Modal Brain Imaging Phenotypes and Genetic Risk Factors via a Dirty Multi-Task Learning Method.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trustworthy causal biomarker discovery: a multiomics brain imaging genetics-based approach.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Exploring Brain Imaging and Genetic Risk Factors in Different Progression States of Alzheimer's Disease Through OSnetNMF-Based Methods.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2025Article
- BIGFormer: A Graph Transformer With Local Structure Awareness for Diagnosis and Pathogenesis Identification of Alzheimer's Disease Using Imaging Genetic Data.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2025Article
- Associating brain imaging phenotypes and genetic risk factorsFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Detecting Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease Based on Multi-constrained Uncertainty-Aware Adaptive Sparse Multi-view Canonical Correlation Analysis.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2022Article
- Imaging Genetics in Epilepsy: Current Knowledge and New Perspectives.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain imaging genetics becomes more and more important in brain science, which integrates genetic variations and brain structures or functions to study the genetic basis of brain disorders. The multi-modal imaging data collected by different technologies, measuring the same brain distinctly, might carry complementary information. Unfortunately, we do not know the extent to which the phenotypic variance is shared among multiple imaging modalities, which further might trace back to the complex genetic mechanism. In this paper, we propose a novel dirty multi-task sparse canonical correlation analysis (SCCA) to study imaging genetic problems with multi-modal brain imaging quantitative traits (QTs) involved. The proposed method takes advantages of the multi-task learning and parameter decomposition. It can not only identify the shared imaging QTs and genetic loci across multiple modalities, but also identify the modality-specific imaging QTs and genetic loci, exhibiting a flexible capability of identifying complex multi-SNP-multi-QT associations. Using the state-of-the-art multi-view SCCA and multi-task SCCA, the proposed method shows better or comparable canonical correlation coefficients and canonical weights on both synthetic and real neuroimaging genetic data. In addition, the identified modality-consistent biomarkers, as well as the modality-specific biomarkers, provide meaningful and interesting information, demonstrating the dirty multi-task SCCA could be a powerful alternative method in multi-modal brain imaging genetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.