Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32760087›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Characterisation of protein isoforms encoded by the Drosophila Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 gene shaggy.

Dagmara Korona, Daniel Nightingale, Bertrand Fabre, Michael Nelson, Bettina Fischer, Glynnis Johnson, Jonathan Lees, Simon Hubbard, Kathryn Lilley, Steven Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Interactomes of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Isoforms.Journal of proteome research · 2023
    Article
  3. eLife · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dagmara KoronaDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5988-3894
Daniel NightingaleDepartment of Biochemistry, Cambridge Centre for Proteomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Bertrand FabreDepartment of Biochemistry, Cambridge Centre for Proteomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Michael NelsonFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Bettina FischerDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Glynnis JohnsonDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jonathan LeesDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Simon HubbardFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Kathryn LilleyDepartment of Biochemistry, Cambridge Centre for Proteomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Steven RussellDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0546-3031

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L002817/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila shaggy gene (sgg, GSK-3) encodes multiple protein isoforms with serine/threonine kinase activity and is a key player in diverse developmental signalling pathways. Currently it is unclear whether different Sgg proteoforms are similarly involved in signalling or if different proteoforms have distinct functions. We used CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering to tag eight different Sgg proteoform classes and determined their localization during embryonic development. We performed proteomic analysis of the two major proteoform classes and generated mutant lines for both of these for transcriptomic and phenotypic analysis. We uncovered distinct tissue-specific localization patterns for all of the tagged proteoforms we examined, most of which have not previously been characterised directly at the protein level, including one proteoform initiating with a non-standard codon. Collectively, this suggests complex developmentally regulated splicing of the sgg primary transcript. Further, affinity purification followed by mass spectrometric analyses indicate a different repertoire of interacting proteins for the two major proteoforms we examined, one with ubiquitous expression (Sgg-PB) and one with nervous system specific expression (Sgg-PA). Specific mutation of these proteoforms shows that Sgg-PB performs the well characterised maternal and zygotic segmentations functions of the sgg locus, while Sgg-PA mutants show adult lifespan and locomotor defects consistent with its nervous system localisation. Our findings provide new insights into the role of GSK-3 proteoforms and intriguing links with the GSK-3α and GSK-3β proteins encoded by independent vertebrate genes. Our analysis suggests that different proteoforms generated by alternative splicing are likely to perform distinct functions.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGlycogen Synthase Kinase 3IsoenzymesProteomicsDrosophila ProteinsGlycogen Synthase Kinase 3IsoenzymesSgg protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID32760087
PMCPMC7410302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.