Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32763504›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2020

Tumor-targeted pH-low insertion peptide delivery of theranostic gadolinium nanoparticles for image-guided nanoparticle-enhanced radiation therapy.

Wu Liu, John Deacon, Huagang Yan, Bo Sun, Yanfeng Liu, Denise Hegan, Qin Li, Daniel Coman, Maxime Parent, Fahmeed Hyder and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Wu LiuDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: wuliu@stanford.edu.
John DeaconDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Huagang YanDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Bo SunDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Yanfeng LiuDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Denise HeganDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Qin LiDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Daniel ComanDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Maxime ParentDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Fahmeed HyderDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, School of Engineering and Applied Science, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kenneth RobertsDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ravinder NathDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Olivier TillementUniv Lyon Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Institut Lumière Matière, Lyon, France.
Donald EngelmanDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Peter GlazerDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USCapital Medical University · CNDalian Medical University · CNInstitut Lumière Matière · FRStanford Medicine · USWhitney Museum of American Art · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Tumor-targeted delivery and cell internalization of theranostic gadolinium nanoparticles for image-guided nanoparticle-enhanced radiation therapyR21EB026553 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PRATX, GUILLEM · 2019 to 2022
$594k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB026553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor targeting studies using metallic nanoparticles (NPs) have shown that the enhanced permeability and retention effect may not be sufficient to deliver the amount of intratumoral and intracellular NPs needed for effective in vivo radiosensitization. This work describes a pH-Low Insertion Peptide (pHLIP) targeted theranostic agent to enable image-guided NP-enhanced radiotherapy using a clinically feasible amount of injected NPs. Conventional gadolinium (Gd) NPs were conjugated to pHLIPs and evaluated in vitro for radiosensitivity and in vivo for mouse MRI. Cultured A549 human lung cancer cells were incubated with 0.5 mM of pHLIP-GdNP or conventional GdNP. Mass spectrometry showed 78-fold more cellular Gd uptake with pHLIP-GdNPs, and clonogenic survival assays showed 44% more enhanced radiosensitivity by 5 Gy irradiation with pHLIP-GdNPs at pH 6.2. In contrast to conventional GdNPs, MR imaging of tumor-bearing mice showed pHLIP-GdNPs had a long retention time in the tumor (>9 h), suitable for radiotherapy, and penetrated into the poorly-vascularized tumor core. The Gd-enhanced tumor corresponded with low-pH areas also independently measured by an in vivo molecular MRI technique. pHLIPs actively target cell surface acidity from tumor cell metabolism and deliver GdNPs into cells in solid tumors. Intracellular delivery enhances the effect of short-range radiosensitizing photoelectrons and Auger electrons. Because acidity is a general hallmark of tumor cells, the delivery is more general than antibody targeting. Imaging the in vivo NP biodistribution and more acidic (often more aggressive) tumors has the potential for quantitative radiotherapy treatment planning and pre-selecting patients who will likely benefit more from NP radiation enhancement.

Indexed as

Cell internalizationMetallic nanoparticle radiosensitizationMRIRadiation physicsTargeting acidic tumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID32763504
PMCPMC7408331
OpenAlexW3047443326

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.