Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32766217›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Investigation and Prediction of Human Interactome Based on Quantitative Features.

Xiaoyong Pan, Tao Zeng, Yu-Hang Zhang, Lei Chen, Kaiyan Feng, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Single-Cell Protein Assays in Context: From 2D to 3D and In Situ Analysis.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Identifying Transcriptomic Signatures and Rules for SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoyong PanSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Tao ZengKey Laboratory of Systems Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Hang ZhangShanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Lei ChenCollege of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.
Kaiyan FengDepartment of Computer Science, Guangdong AIB Polytechnic, Guangzhou, China.
Tao HuangShanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Dong CaiSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein is one of the most significant components of all living creatures. All significant and essential biological structures and functions relies on proteins and their respective biological functions. However, proteins cannot perform their unique biological significance independently. They have to interact with each other to realize the complicated biological processes in all living creatures including human beings. In other words, proteins depend on interactions (protein-protein interactions) to realize their significant effects. Thus, the significance comparison and quantitative contribution of candidate PPI features must be determined urgently. According to previous studies, 258 physical and chemical characteristics of proteins have been reported and confirmed to definitively affect the interaction efficiency of the related proteins. Among such features, essential physiochemical features of proteins like stoichiometric balance, protein abundance, molecular weight and charge distribution have been validated to be quite significant and irreplaceable for protein-protein interactions (PPIs). Therefore, in this study, we, on one hand, presented a novel computational framework to identify the key factors affecting PPIs with Boruta feature selection (BFS), Monte Carlo feature selection (MCFS), incremental feature selection (IFS), and on the other hand, built a quantitative decision-rule system to evaluate the potential PPIs under real conditions with random forest (RF) and RIPPER algorithms, thereby supplying several new insights into the detailed biological mechanisms of complicated PPIs. The main datasets and codes can be downloaded at https://github.com/xypan1232/Mass-PPI.

Indexed as

decision treehuman interactomepredictionprotein–protein interactionquantitative feature

Identifiers

PMID32766217
PMCPMC7379396

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.