Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32767708›Full record

ArticleClinical obesity2020

Cognitive and behavioural strategies employed to overcome "lapses" and prevent "relapse" among weight-loss maintainers and regainers: A qualitative study.

Emma R Lawlor, Carly A Hughes, Robbie Duschinsky, Gillian D Pountain, Andrew J Hill, Simon J Griffin, Amy L Ahern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical obesity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. How does the food environment influence people engaged in weight management? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma R LawlorMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0742-0476
Carly A HughesFakenham Medical Practice, Norfolk, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9560-7873
Robbie DuschinskyPrimary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Gillian D PountainPatient and public representative.
Andrew J HillDivision of Psychological & Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Simon J GriffinMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Amy L AhernMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-4758

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/J000493/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/6Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While many behavioural weight management programmes are effective in the short-term, post-programme weight regain is common. Overcoming "lapses" and preventing "relapse" has been highlighted as important in weight-loss maintenance, but little is known on how this is achieved. This study aimed to compare the cognitive and behavioural strategies employed to overcome "lapses" and prevent "relapse" by people who had regained weight or maintained weight-loss after participating in a weight management programme. By investigating differences between groups, we intended to identify strategies associated with better weight-loss maintenance. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 participants (58% female) recruited from the 5-year follow-up of the Weight Loss Referrals for Adults in Primary Care (WRAP) trial (evaluation of a commercial weight-loss programme). Participants who had lost ≥5% baseline weight during the active intervention were purposively sampled according to 5-year weight trajectories (n = 16 'Regainers', n = 10 'Maintainers'). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically. Key differences in strategies were that Maintainers continued to pay attention to their dietary intake, anticipated and planned for potential lapses in high-risk situations, and managed impulses using distraction techniques. Regainers did not report making plans, used relaxed dietary monitoring, found distraction techniques to be ineffective and appeared to have difficulty navigating food within interpersonal relationships. This study is one of the longest qualitative follow-ups of a weight loss trial to date, offering unique insights into long-term maintenance. Future programmes should emphasize strategies focusing on self-monitoring, planning and managing interpersonal relationships to help participants successfully maintain weight-loss in the longer-term.

Indexed as

Body Weight MaintenanceAdultAgedBehavior TherapyBody-Weight TrajectoryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityQualitative ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceSecondary PreventionWeight Reduction Programslapsesqualitativerelapsestrategiesweight-loss maintenanceweight-management programmes

Identifiers

PMID32767708
PMCPMC7116423

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.