Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770075›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A single unified model for fitting simple to complex receptor response data.

Peter Buchwald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cooperative Gating of a KJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Nanomechanoelectrical approach to highly sensitive and specific label-free DNA detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. RobustFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  17. Regioselective One-Pot Synthesis of Hydroxy-(Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter BuchwaldDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology and Diabetes Research Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. pbuchwald@med.miami.edu.

Funding

Allosteric Costimulatory BlockadeR01AI101041 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BUCHWALD, PETER · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI101041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fitting of complex receptor-response data where fractional response and occupancy do not match is challenging. They encompass important cases including (a) the presence of "receptor reserve" and/or partial agonism, (b) multiple responses assessed at different vantage points along a pathway, (c) responses that are different along diverging downstream pathways (biased agonism), and (d) constitutive activity. For these, simple models such as the well-known Clark or Hill equations cannot be used. Those that can, such as the operational (Black&Leff) model, do not provide a unified approach, have multiple nonintuitive parameters that are challenging to fit in well-defined manner, have difficulties incorporating binding data, and cannot be reduced or connected to simpler forms. We have recently introduced a quantitative receptor model (SABRE) that includes parameters for Signal Amplification (γ), Binding affinity (K

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalReceptors, DrugBinding SitesLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionLigandsReceptors, DrugReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID32770075
PMCPMC7414914

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.