ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020
Analysis of microRNA processing machinery gene (DROSHA, DICER1, RAN, and XPO5) variants association with end-stage renal disease.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unleash Multifunctional Role of miRNA Biogenesis Gene Variants (Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 codon 17 variant and expression on vitiligo risk.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021Article
- Analysis of microRNA processing machinery gene (DROSHA, DICER1, RAN, and XPO5) variants association with end-stage renal disease.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicroRNA (miRNA) processing machinery gene variant was associated with several diseases. We aimed to explore for the first time the association of machinery gene (DROSHA rs10719A/G; DICER1 rs3742330A/G; RAN rs14035C/T; and XPO5 rs11077T/G) variants with the susceptibility and phenotype of end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
methodA total of 281 participants (98 ESRD patients and 183 healthy volunteers) were enrolled. Real-Time TaqMan allelic discrimination assay was applied for the genotyping of the specified variants. Multiple logistic regression models, univariate, multivariate, and principal component analyses were carried out.
resultsCarrying one DICER1 rs3742330*G allele conferred protection against developing ESRD [heterozygote comparison: OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.15-0.62, dominant model: OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.17-0.70]. Similarly, for XPO5 rs11077T/G, homozygote and heterozygote carriers of G variant were less likely to develop ESRD [homozygote comparison: adjusted OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.11-0.50, and heterozygote comparison: OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.22-0.92, and allelic model: OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.34-0.70]. RAN rs14035*TT subjects were 5 times more likely to develop ESRD while being heterozygote (CT) have twice the risk [homozygote comparison: 5.18, 95% CI = 2.28-11.8, heterozygote comparison: OR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.10-409]. Subgroup analysis also detected DICER1 rs3742330*A, XPO5 rs11077*T, and RAN rs14035*T as genetic risk determinants for ESRD development in both sex and age categories. Two genotype combinations of DROSHA/DICER1/XPO5/RAN were associated with increased susceptibility to ESRD [A-A-T-T: OR = 9.49, 95%CI = 2.48-36.31 (P = .001) and G-A-T-T: OR = 5.92, 95%CI = 1.77-19.83 (P = .004), respectively].
conclusionVariants and combined genotypes of DICER1 rs3742330, XPO5 rs11077, and RAN rs14035 might be associated with ESRD development in the study population. Integrating molecular analysis in ESRD risk stratification is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.