Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32779262›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2020

A framework for pathway knowledge driven prioritization in genome-wide association studies.

Shrayashi Biswas, Soumen Pal, Partha P Majumder, Samsiddhi Bhattacharjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shrayashi BiswasNational Institute of Biomedical Genomics, Kalyani, India.
Soumen PalNational Institute of Biomedical Genomics, Kalyani, India.
Partha P MajumderNational Institute of Biomedical Genomics, Kalyani, India.
Samsiddhi BhattacharjeeNational Institute of Biomedical Genomics, Kalyani, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8549-1130

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many variants with low frequencies or with low to modest effects likely remain unidentified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) because of stringent genome-wide thresholds for detection. To improve the power of detection, variant prioritization based on their functional annotations and epigenetic landmarks has been used successfully. Here, we propose a novel method of prioritization of a GWAS by exploiting gene-level knowledge (e.g., annotations to pathways and ontologies) and show that it further improves power. Often, disease associated variants are found near genes that are coinvolved in specific biological pathways relevant to disease process. Utilization of this knowledge to conduct a prioritized scan increases the power to detect loci that map to genes clustered in a few specific pathways. We have developed a computationally scalable framework based on penalized logistic regression (termed GKnowMTest-Genomic Knowledge-guided Multiplte Testing) to enable a prioritized pathway-guided GWAS scan with a very large number of gene-level annotations. We demonstrate that the proposed strategy improves overall power and maintains the Type 1 error globally. Our method works on genome-wide summary level data and a user-specified list of pathways (e.g., those extracted from large pathway databases without reference to biology of a specific disease). It automatically reweights the input p values by incorporating the pathway enrichments as "adaptively learned" from the data using a cross-validation technique to avoid overfitting. We used whole-genome simulations and some publicly available GWAS data sets to illustrate the application of our method. The GKnowMTest framework has been implemented as a user-friendly open-source R package.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Genome, HumanHumansModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGWASLASSO penaltylogistic regressionpathwaysprioritizationweighted p values

Identifiers

PMID32779262
PMCPMC7116354

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.