Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32781508›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Sex-Specific Features of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease.

Volha I Summerhill, Donato Moschetta, Alexander N Orekhov, Paolo Poggio, Veronika A Myasoedova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Conventional Prostheses versus Sutureless Perceval for Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Volha I SummerhillDepartment of Basic Research, Institute for Atherosclerosis Research, Skolkovo Innovative Center, 121609 Moscow, Russia.
Donato MoschettaUnit for the Study of Aortic, Valvular and Coronary Pathologies, Monzino Cardiology Center IRCCS, 20138 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7746-8539
Alexander N OrekhovDepartment of Basic Research, Institute for Atherosclerosis Research, Skolkovo Innovative Center, 121609 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3318-4681
Paolo PoggioUnit for the Study of Aortic, Valvular and Coronary Pathologies, Monzino Cardiology Center IRCCS, 20138 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7225-3379
Veronika A MyasoedovaUnit for the Study of Aortic, Valvular and Coronary Pathologies, Monzino Cardiology Center IRCCS, 20138 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8414-5300

Funding

Russian Science Support Foundation 18-15-00254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is the most common valvular heart disease in developed countries predominantly affecting the elderly population therefore posing a large economic burden. It is a gradually progressive condition ranging from mild valve calcification and thickening, without the hemodynamic obstruction, to severe calcification impairing leaflet motion, known as aortic stenosis (AS). The progression of CAVD occurs over many years, and it is extremely variable among individuals. It is also associated with an increased risk of coronary events and mortality. The recent insights into the CAVD pathophysiology included an important role of sex. Accumulating evidence suggests that, in patients with CAVD, sex can determine important differences in the relationship between valvular calcification process, fibrosis, and aortic stenosis hemodynamic severity between men and women. Consequently, it has implications on the development of different valvular phenotypes, left ventricular hypertrophy, and cardiovascular outcomes in men and women. Along these lines, taking into account the sex-related differences in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment outcomes is of profound importance. In this review, the sex-related differences in patients with CAVD, in terms of pathobiology, clinical phenotypes, and outcomes were discussed.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCalcinosisFemaleHumansHypertrophy, Left VentricularMalePhenotypeSignal TransductionTreatment Outcomeaortic valve calcificationaortic valve stenosiscalcific aortic valve diseasefibrosisleft ventricular hypertrophysex differences

Identifiers

PMID32781508
PMCPMC7460640

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.