Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32784161›Full record

ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2020

Cone-Beam CT Compared to Multi-Slice CT for the Diagnostic Analysis of Conductive Hearing Loss: A Feasibility Study.

Pieter Kemp, Jiska Van Stralen, Pim De Graaf, Erwin Berkhout, Pepijn Van Horssen, Paul Merkus

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Preoperative Imaging for Cochlear Implantation: A Global Consensus.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Clinical applications of portable CT scanners.The British journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exploratory tympanotomy in conductive hearing loss with normal pre-operative investigations.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pieter KempDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear - Hearing, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jiska Van StralenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear - Hearing, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pim De GraafDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center - Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin BerkhoutDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pepijn Van HorssenDepartment of Physics and Medical Technology, Amsterdam University Medical Center - Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul MerkusDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear - Hearing, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAcademic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMultislice computed tomography (MSCT) is commonly used as a diagnostic tool for patients with a conductive hearing loss. Recent studies indicate that cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) may be used as a low-radiation dose alternative for temporal bone imaging. This study compares image quality and radiation dose between CBCT and MSCT when assessing anatomical landmarks related to conductive hearing loss. MATERIALS AND

methodsFive human cadaver heads (10 ears) were imaged on the NewTom 5G CBCT and the Discovery CT750 HD MSCT. Visibility of 16 anatomical landmarks of the middle and inner ear was assessed by two observers on a 4-point Likert scale. Furthermore, effective radiation dose was compared, and contrast-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution were measured with a phantom head.

resultsImage quality of CBCT was assessed as superior to MSCT. Effective radiation dose of the high-resolution CBCT protocol was 30.5% of the clinical MSCT dose. High-resolution CBCT was reported as having a higher spatial resolution and superior contrast-to-noise perception in comparison with MSCT.

conclusionHigh-resolution CBCT was evaluated as superior to MSCT in the assessment of structures related to conductive hearing loss. Furthermore, CBCT imaging resulted in a considerably lower effective radiation dose.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksCadaverCone-Beam Computed TomographyEar, InnerEar, MiddleFeasibility StudiesHearing Loss, ConductiveHumansMultidetector Computed TomographyObserver VariationRadiation DosageTemporal Bone

Identifiers

PMID32784161
PMCPMC7419106
OpenAlexW3045513386

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.