Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32786839›Full record

ArticleJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2020

Effects of Anthocyanin Extracts from Bilberry (

Kang Chen, Xuetao Wei, Jian Zhang, Raghunath Pariyani, Johanna Jokioja, Maaria Kortesniemi, Kaisa M Linderborg, Jari Heinonen, Tuomo Sainio, Yumei Zhang and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Food science & nutrition · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Nutrients · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Effects of Xinjiang wild cherry plum (Frontiers in nutrition · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kang ChenFood Chemistry and Food Development, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, Turun yliopisto, Turku FI-20014, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5791-9523
Xuetao WeiBeijing Key Laboratory of Toxicological Research and Risk Assessment for Food Safety, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Raghunath PariyaniFood Chemistry and Food Development, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, Turun yliopisto, Turku FI-20014, Finland.
Johanna JokiojaFood Chemistry and Food Development, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, Turun yliopisto, Turku FI-20014, Finland.
Maaria KortesniemiFood Chemistry and Food Development, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, Turun yliopisto, Turku FI-20014, Finland.
Kaisa M LinderborgFood Chemistry and Food Development, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, Turun yliopisto, Turku FI-20014, Finland.
Jari HeinonenSchool of Engineering Science, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta FI-53850, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1308-4755
Tuomo SainioSchool of Engineering Science, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta FI-53850, Finland.
Yumei ZhangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Baoru YangFood Chemistry and Food Development, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, Turun yliopisto, Turku FI-20014, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5561-514X
University of Turku · FIPeking University · CNLappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the effects of the nonacylated and acylated anthocyanin-rich extracts on plasma metabolic profiles of Zucker diabetic fatty rats. The rats were fed with the nonacylated anthocyanin extract from bilberries (NAAB) or the acylated anthocyanin extract from purple potatoes (AAPP) at daily doses of 25 and 50 mg/kg body weight for 8 weeks.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimalsAnthocyaninsBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalGlucose-6-PhosphataseHumansInsulin ResistanceLipid MetabolismLiverMalePlant ExtractsPlant TubersProteinsRatsRats, ZuckerAmino AcidsAnthocyaninsBlood GlucoseGlucose-6-PhosphatasePlant ExtractsProteinsTBC1D1 protein, ratacylated anthocyaninsNMR metabolomicsnonacylated anthocyaninstype 2 diabetesZucker diabetic fatty rats

Identifiers

PMID32786839
PMCPMC7586333
OpenAlexW3048445505

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.