Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32789790›Full record

ReviewReviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology2020

Molecular Mechanisms of Fuchs and Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Corneal Dystrophies.

Darpan Malhotra, Joseph R Casey

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Altered gene expression in slc4a11Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Darpan MalhotraDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Joseph R CaseyDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. joe.casey@ualberta.ca.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cornea, the eye's outermost layer, protects the eye from the environment. The cornea's innermost layer is an endothelium separating the stromal layer from the aqueous humor. A central role of the endothelium is to maintain stromal hydration state. Defects in maintaining this hydration can impair corneal clarity and thus visual acuity. Two endothelial corneal dystrophies, Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) and Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy (CHED), are blinding corneal diseases with varied clinical presentation in patients across different age demographics. Recessive CHED with an early onset (typically age: 0-3 years) and dominantly inherited FECD with a late onset (age: 40-50 years) have similar phenotypes, although caused by defects in several different genes. A range of molecular mechanisms have been proposed to explain FECD and CHED pathology given the involvement of multiple causative genes. This critical review provides insight into the proposed molecular mechanisms underlying FECD and CHED pathology along with common pathways that may explain the link between the defective gene products and provide a new perspective to view these genetic blinding diseases.

Indexed as

Corneal Dystrophies, HereditaryFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyAdultChild, PreschoolCorneaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedCell adhesionCHEDCOL8A2Corneal dystrophyCorneal endotheliumDescemet’s membraneFECDMolecular mechanismSLC4A11TCF4

Identifiers

PMID32789790
OpenAlexW3049368087

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.