ArticleNursing open2020
Nurses' perceptions of patient participation in the myocardial infarction pathway.
Article in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient Needs Regarding Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnographic Synthesis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Patient Participation During Nursing Bedside Handover: A State-of-the-Art Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Translation and Validation for the Portuguese Population of the Bedside Handover Attitudes and Behaviors Questionnaire.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Translation and psychometric validation of the Patient Participation Culture Tool for healthcare workers in Chinese nursing context.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Nurses' perceptions of factors influencing treatment engagement among patients with cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review.BMC nursing · 2021Article
- Individual nursing promotes rehabilitation of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Nurses' perceptions of patient participation in the myocardial infarction pathway.Nursing open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To explore nurses' perceptions of patient participation in different phases of the myocardial infarction pathway. Design: Qualitative design with a hermeneutical approach. Methods: Five focus groups were conducted at two hospitals, one with and one without percutaneous coronary intervention facilities, between February-November 2018. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling. Twenty-two nurses experienced in cardiac care participated. The analysis had a hermeneutical approach. Results: The findings revealed nurses' perceptions of patient participation in different phases of the myocardial infarction pathway. Four themes were identified: (a) variation between paternalism and autonomy in the acute phase; (b) individualization of dialogue and patient participation during treatment; (c) lack of coherence in the pathway hinders patient participation at discharge; and (d) cardiac rehabilitation promotes patients' autonomous decisions in lifestyle changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.