SynthesisClinical rheumatology2021
TNFSF4 is a risk factor to systemic lupus erythematosus in a Latin American population.
Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Risk factors of systemic lupus erythematosus: an overview of systematic reviews and Mendelian randomization studies.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the association of three TNFSF4 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) susceptibility in Mexican patients.
methodsGenotypes of the TNFSF4 rs1234315T/C, rs2205960G/T, and rs704840T/G SNVs were determined using a TaqMan assay. In our study, we included 395 patients with SLE and 500 controls.
resultsOur information shows a significant difference in the allelic and genotypic frequency of the three TNFSF4 SNVs between cases and controls. Thus, our data showed an association between TNFSF4 rs1234315T/C (T vs. C, OR 1.40, p = 0.00087), rs2205960G/T (G vs. T, OR 1.32, p = 0.0037), and rs704840T/G (T vs. G, OR 1.41, p = 0.0003) and SLE susceptibility in Mexican subjects. Besides, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the role of TNFSF4 rs2205960G/T and SLE susceptibility; our results showed that this variant is a risk factor for SLE in Latin Americans and Asians.
conclusionOur results show that TNFSF4 rs1234315T/C, rs2205960G/T, and rs704840T/G are risk factors to SLE in Mexicans. This is the first study to document an association between TNFSF4 rs704840T/G and SLE in a Latin American population. In addition, our meta-analysis showed that TNFSF4 rs2205960G/T is a risk factor for Asians and Latin Americans. Key Point • The TNFSF4 rs1234315T/C, rs2205960G/T, and rs704849T/G SNVs are risk factors to SLE in patients from Mexico.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.