Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32809173›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2021

The Use of Aspirin in Contemporary Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases Revisited: The Increasing Need and Call for a Personalized Therapeutic Approach.

Zlatko Fras, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Maciej Banach

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Long-Term Effects of Low-Dose Aspirin on Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Bleeding Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Zlatko FrasDivision of Medicine, Department of Vascular Medicine, Centre for Preventive Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia. zlatko.fras@kclj.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0442-6175
Amirhossein SahebkarHalal Research Center of IRI, FDA, Tehran, Iran.
Maciej BanachCardiovascular Research Centre, University of Zielona-Gora, Zielona Gora, Poland.
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SIMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRPolish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of aspirin has been widely accepted for the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in all patient populations, as the benefits linked to the reduction of clinical events outweigh the risk of major bleeding. However, despite the undisputable, though modest, potential of aspirin to reduce atherothrombotic events, its overall efficacy and safety in primary ASCVD prevention remains debatable, despite being used for this purpose for decades. The net clinical benefit of aspirin was brought into question by three recent large contemporary randomized controlled trials evaluating its role in various primary prevention populations (individuals with diabetes [ASCEND], an elderly population [ASPREE], and middle-aged adults at high estimated cardiovascular risk [ARRIVE]) and numerous large meta-analyses published during the past year. As a result, the usual generalized recommendations for the use of aspirin in patients with estimated intermediate to high ASCVD risk but without overt ASCVD have already been removed from most international guidelines. Since the primary prevention framework encompasses heterogenous groups of subjects with variable absolute ASCVD risk, a more individualized approach based on the best possible estimated ratio between the potential health benefits from fewer atherothrombotic events and harms because of potential increases in major bleeding is warranted in clinical practice. With this compromise, clinicians can better decide on the personalized use of aspirin in patients at high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events.

Indexed as

AspirinAtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusDose-Response Relationship, DrugHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasmsPrimary PreventionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAspirin

Identifiers

PMID32809173
OpenAlexW3053828454

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.