Evidence mapPaperPMID 32817647Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Simplifying the screening of gestational diabetes by maternal age plus fasting plasma glucose at first prenatal visit: A prospective cohort study.

Yi-Yun Tai, Chien-Nan Lee, Chun-Heng Kuo, Ming-Wei Lin, Kuan-Yu Chen, Shin-Yu Lin, Hung-Yuan Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Pregnancy as an opportunity to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus: FIGO Best Practice Advice.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Yun TaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8713-9627
Chien-Nan LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chun-Heng KuoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Ming-Wei LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kuan-Yu ChenTaiwan Department of Internal Medicine, ANSN clinic, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Shin-Yu LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0753-2793
Hung-Yuan LiDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWFu Jen Catholic University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe addition of maternal age to fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at 24-28 gestational weeks improves the performance of GDM screening as maternal age increases. However, this method delays the diagnosis of GDM. Since FPG at the first prenatal visit (FPV) is a screening option for pre-existing diabetes, we evaluated the performance of age plus FPG at the FPV to reduce the need for the OGTT.

methodsPregnant women were recruited consecutively in 2013-2018 (the training cohort) and 2019 (the validation cohort). We excluded women with twin pregnancies, unavailable FPG at the FPV or OGTT data, pre-pregnancy diabetes, or a history of GDM. All participants underwent FPG and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at the FPV and received 75-g OGTT at 24-28 gestational weeks if FPG at the FPV was <92 mg/dL. GDM was diagnosed by the IADPSG criteria. Two algorithms were developed with the cutoffs determined when the percentage requiring OGTT (OGTT%) was the lowest and the sensitivity was ≥90%.

resultsThe incidence of GDM increased with age. The "FPG at the FPV" algorithm reduced OGTT% to 68.8% with the FPG cutoff at 79 mg/dl. The "age plus FPG at the FPV" algorithm, with the cutoff of 114, further reduced OGTT% to 58.3%, with the sensitivity of 90.7% (9.3% GDM missed) and the specificity of 100%. These findings were replicated in the validation cohort.

conclusionsScreening GDM by maternal age plus FPG at the FPV can reduce OGTT%, especially in populations with a significant proportion of pregnant women with advanced ages.

Indexed as

AdultBlood GlucoseDiabetes, GestationalFastingFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestGlycated HemoglobinHumansMass ScreeningMaternal AgePregnancyProspective StudiesBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID32817647
PMCPMC7444589
OpenAlexW3080719033

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.