Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32820046›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2020

Canonical Notch ligands and Fringes have distinct effects on NOTCH1 and NOTCH2.

Shinako Kakuda, Rachel K LoPilato, Atsuko Ito, Robert S Haltiwanger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. DifferentialProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Notch2-expressing CD4Cellular & molecular immunology · 2025
    Article
  6. Nagoya journal of medical science · 2025
    Article
  7. Functional Divergence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. ProteinMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shinako KakudaDepartment of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Rachel K LoPilatoComplex Carbohydrate Research Center, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Atsuko ItoComplex Carbohydrate Research Center, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Robert S HaltiwangerDepartment of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA; Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA. Electronic address: rhalti@uga.edu.
University of Georgia · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

O-Glycosylation of Epidermal Growth Factor-like MotifsR01GM061126 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI HALTIWANGER, ROBERT S. · 2001 to 2021
$9.1M
Glycoscience Training ProgramT32GM107004 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI AMSTER, I JONATHAN, HALTIWANGER, ROBERT S. · 2014 to 2021
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061126NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM107004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Notch signaling is a cellular pathway regulating cell-fate determination and adult tissue homeostasis. Little is known about how canonical Notch ligands or Fringe enzymes differentially affect NOTCH1 and NOTCH2. Using cell-based Notch signaling and ligand-binding assays, we evaluated differences in NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 responses to Delta-like (DLL) and Jagged (JAG) family members and the extent to which Fringe enzymes modulate their activity. In the absence of Fringes, DLL4-NOTCH1 activation was more than twice that of DLL4-NOTCH2, whereas all other ligands activated NOTCH2 similarly or slightly more than NOTCH1. However, NOTCH2 showed less sensitivity to the Fringes. Lunatic fringe (LFNG) enhanced NOTCH2 activation by DLL1 and -4, and Manic fringe (MFNG) inhibited NOTCH2 activation by JAG1 and -2. Mass spectral analysis showed that

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsCalcium-Binding ProteinsCHO CellsCricetulusHEK293 CellsHumansLigandsMiceNIH 3T3 CellsReceptor, Notch1Receptor, Notch2Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCalcium-Binding ProteinsDlk1 protein, mouseDLL4 protein, mouseLigandsNotch1 protein, mouseNotch2 protein, mouseReceptor, Notch1Receptor, Notch2Fringeglycosylationglycosyltransferasemass spectrometrymass spectrometry (MS)NOTCH1NOTCH2Notch receptorsignal transduction

Identifiers

PMID32820046
PMCPMC7586220
OpenAlexW3081306231

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.