Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32821262›Full record

ArticleDrugs in context2020

Potential risk of drug-drug interactions with hormonal contraceptives and antiretrovirals: prevalence in women living with HIV.

Milena M Murray, Ashley Jensen, Thomas Cieslik, Susan E Cohn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs in context, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milena M MurrayMidwestern University, Chicago College of Pharmacy, 555 31st Street, Downers Grove, IL 60515, USA.
Ashley JensenMidwestern University, Chicago College of Pharmacy, 555 31st Street, Downers Grove, IL 60515, USA.
Thomas CieslikMidwestern University, Chicago College of Pharmacy, 555 31st Street, Downers Grove, IL 60515, USA.
Susan E CohnNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 645 N. Michigan Ave. Suite 900, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Midwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily planning services are vital for women living with HIV (WLH); however, the use of concomitant antiretroviral therapy (ART) and hormonal contraceptives (HCs) may pose challenges due to the risk of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The objectives of this study were to assess ART and HC use among WLH and quantify the frequency of potential DDIs between ART and HCs.

methodsThis was a retrospective, observational, cohort study of WLH aged 18-55 years, prescribed ART, with at least one clinic visit from January 1, 2010 to April 30, 2014. Potential DDIs between HCs and ART were assessed using the University of Liverpool HIV Drug Interactions website (www.hiv-druginteractions.org) and categorized as 'weak potential interaction,' 'potential interaction,' or 'do not co-administer.'

resultsOverall, a contraceptive method was reported in 167 (54%) of the 309 women included in the study. Of those using contraception, 73 (43.7%) reported using HCs, which was most frequently a progestin intrauterine device (

conclusionIn this cohort, one-quarter of WLH on ART-HCs had a potential DDI. Future studies should investigate the impact of DDIs on unintended pregnancies, the side effects of DDIs, and the effects of HC DDIs on ART concentrations.

Indexed as

AIDSantiretroviral agentscisgender womendrug interactionsHIVhormonal contraceptionreproductive healthwomen

Identifiers

PMID32821262
PMCPMC7413590
OpenAlexW3047497560

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.