Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32822065›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2021

Preventative therapeutic approaches for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Tanya Solomon, Aleksandra Filipovska, Livia Hool, Helena Viola

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tanya SolomonSchool of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Aleksandra FilipovskaHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6998-8403
Livia HoolSchool of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Helena ViolaSchool of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4838-0527
The University of Western Australia · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcomeric gene mutations are associated with the development of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Current drug therapeutics for HCM patients are effective in relieving symptoms, but do not prevent or reverse disease progression. Moreover, due to heterogeneity in the clinical manifestations of the disease, patients experience variable outcomes in response to therapeutics. Mechanistically, alterations in calcium handling, sarcomeric disorganization, energy metabolism and contractility participate in HCM disease progression. While some similarities exist, each mutation appears to lead to mutation-specific pathophysiology. Furthermore, these alterations may precede or proceed development of the pathology. This review assesses the efficacy of HCM therapeutics from studies performed in animal models of HCM and human clinical trials. Evidence suggests that a preventative rather than corrective therapeutic approach may be more efficacious in the treatment of HCM. In addition, a clear understanding of mutation-specific mechanisms may assist in informing the most effective therapeutic mode of action.

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, HypertrophicAnimalsCalciumEnergy MetabolismHumansMutationSarcomeresCalciumhypertrophic cardiomyopathymetabolismmitochondriatherapy

Identifiers

PMID32822065
PMCPMC8359240
OpenAlexW3080297714

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.