Evidence mapPaperPMID 32829708Full record

SynthesisLipids in health and disease2020

High-intensity statin therapy yields better outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients: a meta-analysis involving 26,497 patients.

Shiyong Yu, Jun Jin, Zhongxiu Chen, Xiaolu Luo

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lipids in health and disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Development of the first Iranian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Could Plasma CXCL12 Predict Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients with Severe Myocardial Infarction?The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shiyong YuInstitute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Jun JinInstitute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China. jjxqyy012@163.com.
Zhongxiu ChenDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaolu LuoHuoCheNan Community Health Service Center, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Army Medical University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNWuhou District People's Hospital, Chengdu · CNXinqiao Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether high-intensity statin treatment provides more clinical benefits compared with standard statin regimens in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to comparatively assess high-intensity and standard statin regimens for efficacy and safety in patients with ACS.

methodsThe PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies assessing high-intensity vs. standard statin regimens for ACS treatment from inception to April 2020. The publication language was limited to English, and 16 randomized controlled trials were finally included in this study, with a total of 26,497 patients.

resultsCompared to the standard statin regimens, the relative ratio (RR) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in ACS patients treated by high-intensity statin was 0.77 (95%CI, 0.68-0.86; P < 0.00001; prediction interval, 0.56-1.07). In subgroup analysis, high-intensity statin therapy resulted in more clinical benefits regarding MACE compared with standard statin treatment in both Asian (RR = 0.77; 95%CI, 0.61-0.98; P = 0.03) and non-Asian (RR = 0.79; 95%CI, 0.71-0.89; P < 0.0001) patients. Although adverse events were acceptable in patients with ACS administered high-intensity statin therapy, this treatment was associated with a higher rate of adverse events (4.99% vs. 2.98%), including myopathy/myalgia and elevated liver enzymes, as reflected by elevated serum aminotransferase or aminotransferase amounts.

conclusionThe current findings indicated that high-intensity statin therapy might be beneficial in patients with ACS, and close monitoring for adverse effects should be performed.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAsian PeopleDatabases as TopicHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMuscular DiseasesMyalgiaHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAcute coronary syndromesAsiansEfficacyHigh-intensity statin therapyMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsSafety

Identifiers

PMID32829708
PMCPMC7444068
OpenAlexW3080308004

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.