Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32831124›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2020

CAPICE: a computational method for Consequence-Agnostic Pathogenicity Interpretation of Clinical Exome variations.

Shuang Li, K Joeri van der Velde, Dick de Ridder, Aalt D J van Dijk, Dimitrios Soudis, Leslie R Zwerwer, Patrick Deelen, Dennis Hendriksen, Bart Charbon, Marielle E van Gijn and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification of novelResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Shuang LiDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
K Joeri van der VeldeDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Dick de RidderBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Aalt D J van DijkBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Dimitrios SoudisDonald Smits Center for Information and Technology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Leslie R ZwerwerDonald Smits Center for Information and Technology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Patrick DeelenDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Dennis HendriksenGenomics Coordination Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Bart CharbonGenomics Coordination Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Marielle E van GijnDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Kristin AbbottDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Birgit Sikkema-RaddatzDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Cleo C van DiemenDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Wilhelmina S Kerstjens-FrederikseDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Richard J SinkeDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Morris A SwertzDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. m.a.swertz@rug.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0979-3401

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exome sequencing is now mainstream in clinical practice. However, identification of pathogenic Mendelian variants remains time-consuming, in part, because the limited accuracy of current computational prediction methods requires manual classification by experts. Here we introduce CAPICE, a new machine-learning-based method for prioritizing pathogenic variants, including SNVs and short InDels. CAPICE outperforms the best general (CADD, GAVIN) and consequence-type-specific (REVEL, ClinPred) computational prediction methods, for both rare and ultra-rare variants. CAPICE is easily added to diagnostic pipelines as pre-computed score file or command-line software, or using online MOLGENIS web service with API. Download CAPICE for free and open-source (LGPLv3) at https://github.com/molgenis/capice .

Indexed as

ExomeGenetic VariationSoftwareComputational BiologyGene FrequencyGenetic Association StudiesHumansINDEL MutationMachine LearningMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveAllele frequencyClinical geneticsExome sequencingGenome diagnosticsMachine learningMolecular consequenceVariant pathogenicity prediction

Identifiers

PMID32831124
PMCPMC7446154

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.