Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832844›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2020

Associations of Number of Daily Eating Occasions with Type 2 Diabetes Risk in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial.

Marian L Neuhouser, Betsy C Wertheim, Martine M Perrigue, Melanie Hingle, Lesley F Tinker, James M Shikany, Karen C Johnson, Molly E Waring, Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler, Mara Z Vitolins and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Marian L NeuhouserCancer Prevention Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3876-0000
Betsy C WertheimUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Martine M PerrigueDepartment of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.
Melanie HingleDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Lesley F TinkerCancer Prevention Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
James M ShikanyDivision of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Karen C JohnsonUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Department of Preventive Medicine, Memphis, TN, USA.
Molly E WaringDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Rebecca A Seguin-FowlerDepartment of Nutrition and Life Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5115-2341
Mara Z VitolinsDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Eliezer SchnallPsychology Department, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, USA.
Linda SnetselaarDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Cynthia ThomsonCanyon Ranch Center for Prevention & Health Promotion, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USWake Forest University · USWashington State University Spokane · USYeshiva University · US

Funding

Why is the prevalence of obesity so high in U.S. Southern States? Regional predictors of BMI and obesity treatment response.P30DK056336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI James O Hill · 2000 to 2026
$31.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 23 million Americans have type 2 diabetes (T2D). Eating habits such as breakfast consumption, time-restricted eating, and limiting daily eating occasions have been explored as behaviors for reducing T2D risk, but prior evidence is inconclusive.

objectivesOur objectives were to examine associations between number of daily eating occasions and T2D risk in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial (WHI-DM) and whether associations vary by BMI, age, or race/ethnicity.

methodsParticipants were postmenopausal women in the WHI-DM who comprised a 4.6% subsample completing 24-h dietary recalls (24HRs) at years 3 and 6 as part of trial adherence activities (

resultsApproximately 15% (15.4%,

conclusionsFour meals per day compared with 1-3 meals/d was associated with increased risk of T2D in postmenopausal women, but no dose-response effect was observed for additional eating occasions. Further studies are needed to understand eating occasions in relation to T2D risk.

Indexed as

24-hour recallcohorteating frequencypostmenopausal womentype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32832844
PMCPMC7431012
OpenAlexW3044085200

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.