Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32835885›Full record

ReviewMolecular plant2020

Bacterial Vector-Borne Plant Diseases: Unanswered Questions and Future Directions.

Weijie Huang, Paola Reyes-Caldas, Marina Mann, Shirin Seifbarghi, Alexandra Kahn, Rodrigo P P Almeida, Laure Béven, Michelle Heck, Saskia A Hogenhout, Gitta Coaker

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular plant, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recombinant cystatin ingestion byFrontiers in insect science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transcriptomic analysis of early stages of 'Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. 'Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Weijie HuangDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Paola Reyes-CaldasDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Marina MannDepartment of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Shirin SeifbarghiDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Alexandra KahnDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Rodrigo P P AlmeidaDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Laure BévenUMR 1332 Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, Villenave d'Ornon 33882 France.
Michelle HeckDepartment of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; Boyce Thompson Institute, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; Emerging Pests and Pathogens Research Unit, Robert W. Holley Center, USDA ARS, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Saskia A HogenhoutDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK; School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Gitta CoakerDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. Electronic address: glcoaker@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · USJohn Innes Centre · GBUniversity of California, Berkeley · USCornell University · USUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Immune Perception of Bacterial Pathogens in PlantsR35GM136402 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Gitta Laurel Coaker · 2020 to 2026
$3.0M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P012574/1NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vector-borne plant diseases have significant ecological and economic impacts, affecting farm profitability and forest composition throughout the world. Bacterial vector-borne pathogens have evolved sophisticated strategies to interact with their hemipteran insect vectors and plant hosts. These pathogens reside in plant vascular tissue, and their study represents an excellent opportunity to uncover novel biological mechanisms regulating intracellular pathogenesis and to contribute to the control of some of the world's most invasive emerging diseases. In this perspective, we highlight recent advances and major unanswered questions in the realm of bacterial vector-borne disease, focusing on liberibacters, phytoplasmas, spiroplasmas, and Xylella fastidiosa.

Indexed as

BacteriaPhytoplasmaPlant DiseasesVector Borne DiseasesXylellaeffectorliberibacterphytoplasmaplant immunityspiroplasmavector-borne diseaseXylella fastidiosa

Identifiers

PMID32835885
PMCPMC7769051
OpenAlexW3071141616

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.