Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32840085›Full record

ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2020

[Synergistic drug combination prediction in multi-input neural network].

Xi Chen, Yufang Qin, Ming Chen, Chongyang Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xi ChenCollege of Information Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, P.R.China;Key Laboratory of Fisheries Information, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai 201306, P.R.China.
Yufang QinCollege of Information Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, P.R.China;Key Laboratory of Fisheries Information, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai 201306, P.R.China.
Ming ChenCollege of Information Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, P.R.China;Key Laboratory of Fisheries Information, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai 201306, P.R.China.
Chongyang ZhangCollege of Information Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, P.R.China;Key Laboratory of Fisheries Information, Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai 201306, P.R.China.
Shanghai Ocean University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synergistic effects of drug combinations are very important in improving drug efficacy or reducing drug toxicity. However, due to the complex mechanism of action between drugs, it is expensive to screen new drug combinations through trials. It is well known that virtual screening of computational models can effectively reduce the test cost. Recently, foreign scholars successfully predicted the synergistic value of new drug combinations on cancer cell lines by using deep learning model DeepSynergy. However, DeepSynergy is a two-stage method and uses only one kind of feature as input. In this study, we proposed a new end-to-end deep learning model, MulinputSynergy which predicted the synergistic value of drug combinations by integrating gene expression, gene mutation, gene copy number characteristics of cancer cells and anticancer drug chemistry characteristics. In order to solve the problem of high dimension of features, we used convolutional neural network to reduce the dimension of gene features. Experimental results showed that the proposed model was superior to DeepSynergy deep learning model, with the mean square error decreasing from 197 to 176, the mean absolute error decreasing from 9.48 to 8.77, and the decision coefficient increasing from 0.53 to 0.58. This model could learn the potential relationship between anticancer drugs and cell lines from a variety of characteristics and locate the effective drug combinations quickly and accurately.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAntineoplastic AgentsComputational BiologyDrug CombinationsHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Combinationsanticancer drugsdeep learningdrug combinationgene expression

Identifiers

PMID32840085
PMCPMC10319549
OpenAlexW3080700490

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.