ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
A Pipeline for Integrated Theory and Data-Driven Modeling of Biomedical Data.
Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Few-shot genes selection: subset of PAM50 genes for breast cancer subtypes classification.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- CausalMGM: an interactive web-based causal discovery tool.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome sequencing technologies have the potential to transform clinical decision making and biomedical research by enabling high-throughput measurements of the genome at a granular level. However, to truly understand mechanisms of disease and predict the effects of medical interventions, high-throughput data must be integrated with demographic, phenotypic, environmental, and behavioral data from individuals. Further, effective knowledge discovery methods must infer relationships between these data types. We recently proposed a pipeline (CausalMGM) to achieve this. CausalMGM uses probabilistic graphical models to infer the relationships between variables in the data; however, CausalMGM's graphical structure learning algorithm can only handle small datasets efficiently. We propose a new methodology (piPref-Div) that selects the most informative variables for CausalMGM, enabling it to scale. We validate the efficacy of piPref-Div against other feature selection methods and demonstrate how the use of the full pipeline improves breast cancer outcome prediction and provides biologically interpretable views of gene expression data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.