Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32849300›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2020

Fundamental Concepts and Novel Aspects of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: Expert Consensus Resolutions.

Antonio Aversa, Sandro La Vignera, Rocco Rago, Alessandra Gambineri, Rossella E Nappi, Aldo E Calogero, Alberto Ferlin

Open access · goldAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Association ofAnnals of medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Therapeutic effects ofInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio AversaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Sandro La VigneraDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Rocco RagoPhysiopathology of Reproduction and Andrology Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra GambineriDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy.
Rossella E NappiResearch Center for Reproductive Medicine, Gynecological Endocrinology and Menopause, IRCCS San Matteo Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Aldo E CalogeroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Alberto FerlinDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
University of Catania · ITMagna Graecia University · ITOspedale Sandro Pertini · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a very common endocrine and metabolic disorder with the involvement of both genetic and environmental factors. Although much has been clarified on its pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, and therapy, there are still areas of uncertainty. To address fundamental concepts, novel aspects and hypotheses, and future perspectives, including the possible additional benefits of treatment with nutraceuticals, an expert consensus panel formed by endocrinologists and gynecologists was established. After an independent review of the literature, the panel convened electronically on February 3, 2020, and six resolutions were created, debated, and agreed upon discussion, and finally approved in their final form in a consensus livestream meeting held on April 15. The summary of the resolutions are: (1) PCOS is a well-established medical condition that negatively affects reproduction, general health, sexual health, and quality of life; (2) the symptoms and signs of PCOS appear early in life especially in female newborns from PCOS carriers; (3) women with PCOS have significantly increased risk of pregnancy-related complications including gestational diabetes mellitus; (4) a male PCOS equivalent exists, and it may impact on metabolic health and probably on reproduction; (5) the evidence supports that medical therapy for PCOS is effective, rational, and evidence-based; (6) the evidence supports a major research initiative to explore possible benefits of nutraceutical therapy for PCOS. The proposed resolutions may be regarded as points of agreement based on the current scientific evidence available.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeConsensusFemaleHumansInfertility, FemalePolycystic Ovary SyndromePregnancyconsensusmale PCOSmedical therapynutraceuticalsPCOSPCOS carriers

Identifiers

PMID32849300
PMCPMC7431619
OpenAlexW3048753345

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.