Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32850759›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Plant-Based Scaffolds Modify Cellular Response to Drug and Radiation Exposure Compared to Standard Cell Culture Models.

Jerome Lacombe, Ashlee F Harris, Ryan Zenhausern, Sophia Karsunsky, Frederic Zenhausern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Decellularized Scaffolds of Nopal (Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023
    Article
  15. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Effect of mechanical forces on cellular response to radiation.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2022
    Review
  20. Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jerome LacombeCenter for Applied NanoBioscience and Medicine, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Ashlee F HarrisCenter for Applied NanoBioscience and Medicine, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Ryan ZenhausernDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Sophia KarsunskySchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Frederic ZenhausernCenter for Applied NanoBioscience and Medicine, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
University of Arizona · USUniversity of Phoenix · USUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-based scaffolds present many advantages over a variety of biomaterials. Recent studies explored their potential to be repopulated with human cells and thus highlight a growing interest for their use in tissue engineering or for biomedical applications. However, it is still unclear if these

Indexed as

decellularizationplant-based scaffoldradiationstiffnesstissue engineeringYAP/TAZ pathway

Identifiers

PMID32850759
PMCPMC7426640
OpenAlexW3048195510

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.