Evidence mapPaperPMID 32852291Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical oncology2020

Cancer Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States: Results From a National Physician Cross-sectional Survey.

Jane Yuet Ching Hui, Jianling Yuan, Deanna Teoh, Lauren Thomaier, Patricia Jewett, Heather Beckwith, Helen Parsons, Emil Lou, Anne H Blaes, Rachel I Vogel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Adult Hematology/Oncology Patient Perspectives on Telemedicine Highlight Areas of Focus for Future Hybrid Care Models.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of COVID-19 on oncology practice and research in the United States.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jane Yuet Ching HuiDepartments of Surgery.
Jianling YuanRadiation Oncology.
Deanna TeohObstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health.
Lauren ThomaierObstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health.
Patricia JewettDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation.
Heather BeckwithDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation.
Helen ParsonsSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Emil LouDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation.
Anne H BlaesDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation.
Rachel I VogelObstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health.
Palmetto Hematology Oncology · USWomen's Health Research Institute · CARadiation Oncology Associates · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Transplant Biology and TherapyP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · 1998 to 2025
$35.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has significantly impacted health care delivery across the United States, including treatment of cancer. We aim to describe the determinants of treatment plan changes from the perspective of oncology physicians across the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsParticipants were recruited to an anonymous cross-sectional online survey of oncology physicians (surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists) using social media from March 27 to April 10, 2020. Physician demographics, practice characteristics, and cancer treatment decisions were collected.

resultsThe analytic cohort included 411 physicians: 241 (58.6%) surgeons, 106 (25.8%) medical oncologists, and 64 (15.6%) radiation oncologists. In all, 38.0% were practicing in states with 1001 to 5000 confirmed COVID-19 cases as of April 3, 2020, and 37.2% were in states with >5000 cases. Most physicians (N=285; 70.0% of surgeons, 64.4% of medical oncologists, and 73.4% of radiation oncologists) had altered cancer treatment plans. Most respondents were concerned about their patients' COVID-19 exposure risks, but this was the primary driver for treatment alterations only for medical oncologists. For surgeons, the primary driver for treatment alterations was conservation of personal protective equipment, institutional mandates, and external society recommendations. Radiation oncologists were primarily driven by operational changes such as visitor restrictions.

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has caused a majority of oncologists to alter their treatment plans, but the primary motivators for changes differed by oncologic specialty. This has implications for reinstitution of standard cancer treatment, which may occur at differing time points by treatment modality.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDisease ManagementFemaleHumansInfection ControlMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOncologistsPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentPneumonia, ViralPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID32852291
PMCPMC7513953
OpenAlexW3080188819

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.