Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32861921›Full record

ArticlePublic health2020

Ethical guidance for health research in prisons in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

T Ako, E Plugge, R Mhlanga-Gunda, M C Van Hout

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T AkoChief Medical Office, Cameroon Penitentiary Services, Cameroon. Electronic address: terrence.ako@yahoo.com.
E PluggeUK Collaborating Centre for the WHO (Europe) Health in Prisons Programme, Health and Justice, ADT-J Division, Public Health England, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG, England, United Kingdom. Electronic address: emma.plugge@phe.gov.uk.
R Mhlanga-GundaCollege of Health Sciences, Centre for Evaluation of Public Health Interventions, Department of Community Medicine, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe. Electronic address: rosemhlanga3@gmail.com.
M C Van HoutPublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moore's University, Liverpool, L32ET, United Kingdom. Electronic address: m.c.vanhout@ljmu.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_MR/R024278/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examined the extent, range and nature of the published literature, prison policies and technical guidance relating to the ethical conduct of health research in prisons in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). STUDY

designScoping Review.

methodsWe adhered to the five stages of the scoping review iterative process: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, charting the data, and collating, summarizing and content analysis of polices. Disagreements around allocation of content were resolved through team discussion. We also appraised the quality of the included articles.

resultsWe included nine records that examined the ethical aspects of the conduct of health research in prisons in LMICs; eight of these were peer-reviewed publications, and one was a toolkit. Despite the unique vulnerabilities of this group, we could find no comprehensive guidelines on the ethical conduct of health research in prisons in LMICs.

conclusionsThe majority of the world's imprisoned populations are in LMICs, and they have considerable health needs. Research plays an important role in addressing these needs and in so doing, will contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. With regards to health research, imprisoned people in LMICs are 'left behind'; there is a lack of clear, prison-focused guidance and oversight to ensure high quality ethical health research so necessary in LMICs. There is an urgent need for prison health experts to work with health research ethics experts and custodial practitioners for procedural issues in the development of prison-specific ethical guidance for health research in LMICs aligned with international standards.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesGuidelines as TopicPrisonsBiomedical ResearchHumansEthicsHealth researchLMICsPrison

Identifiers

PMID32861921
PMCPMC7449980

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.